The American Atheists
(AA) just erected billboard in Times Square
reading, “Who needs Christ during Christmas?” with an “X” through “Christ.”
While I defend their right to be
offensive, I can still take issue with their message.
Even though the West is quickly abandoning their former secular roots and the freedom of
speech in favor of repressing what is now deemed “hate speech,” we are on a
dangerous trajectory, granting government additional power to suppress speech deemed
“offensive.”
Nevertheless, I think that the AA message is needlessly offensive and even
hypocritical. It is needlessly offensive because it offends without providing
any off-setting content. It represents nothing more than mindless sloganeering.
It contributes no substance, edification, inspiration, or illumination, just
crass intolerance towards the Christian faith. It offers nothing but offense!
It is also offensive because of what it represents – an attempt
to eliminate Christianity! I have dialogued with many militant atheists, and they have made no secret of the fact that
they think that the world will be a better place without Christianity, and for
this they labor! It is worthy of note that they are little different from their
infamous forebears:
- Karl Marx: "In simple truth, I harbour hate 'gainst all the Gods."
- Nikolai Lenin: "Every religious idea, every idea of god, even every flirtation with the idea of God, is unutterable vileness."
- Nikita Khrushchev: "We, Communists ... are atheists ... Public education, the dissemination of scientific knowledge, and the study of the laws of nature, leave no place for belief in God ... We consider that belief in God contradicts our Communist outlook." "We remain the atheists that we have always been; we are doing all we can to liberate those people who are still under the spell of this religious opiate."
These atheistic luminaries were not content to merely speak
against the Christian faith. They strenuously sought to eliminate it along with those who
practiced it. Do we have cause to be offended by this modern crop of militant atheists? Without a doubt!
In addition to the offense, the AA billboard also represents
hypocrisy. Their website announces their purpose:
- American Atheists, Inc., is organized
·
to stimulate and promote freedom of thought and
inquiry concerning religious beliefs, creeds, dogmas, tenets, rituals, and
practices;
·
to encourage the development and public
acceptance of a humane ethical system stressing the mutual sympathy,
understanding, and interdependence of all people and the corresponding
responsibility of each individual in relation to society;
Although the AAs claim that their purpose is “to stimulate
and promote freedom of thought and inquiry,” their billboard is designed to
accomplish the very opposite thing - to silence and discredit any real thought
or discussion. This parallels my own experience with the militants. I have
challenged them to public debates on numerous occasions, but they have always
declined.
They also claim that they want “to encourage the development
and public acceptance of a humane ethical system stressing the mutual sympathy,
understanding, and interdependence of all people.” However, instead of
fostering “mutual sympathy,” their billboard fosters blatant intolerance and an
utter lack of “sympathy.” Instead of wanting to work along with us to improve
society, the AA clearly wants to eliminate us. What else could “Christ” with an
“X” through Him connote!
Meanwhile, the militants have hypocritically accused me of
intolerance, when I have simply referenced surveys and studies that have
demonstrated the ill effects of the gay lifestyle. They have labeled my
“homophobe,” “bigot,” “hate-monger” and even “sexist” – nothing to promote their
goal of “freedom of thought and inquiry.”
The AA’s claim that they are trying to work for a “humane
ethical system,” while they are exhibiting the height of “Christophobia!” While
they bash us for our alleged intolerance, they model the very behavior they
claim to reject! However, they are known by the fruits that they bear.
No comments:
Post a Comment