Atheist Peter Atkins claims that a belief in God(s) is not
only wishful thinking but that it also adds unnecessarily to the elegance and
simplicity of science by introducing an external and foreign agent.
However, doesn’t the addition of “naturalism” equally
introduce an external and foreign agent – a kind of God-substitute?
Instead, it would seem more reasonable to ask:
·
Which of these explanations (theories) of
origins and causation better explains the facts?
No comments:
Post a Comment