When atheists argue that Christianity has been associated
with horrors, I retort that atheistic communism has it beat, by a great leap
forward. Some offer the conservative estimate that communists have murdered one
hundred million in a few short decades.
However, atheists protest that atheism has nothing to do
with communism, even though all of the well-known communists had also been
atheists. For Karl Marx and the other communists, atheism was even an essential
part of communism:
·
Marx stated: "Communism begins from the
outset with atheism…He brandmarked also religion as "the heart of a
heartless world."
Therefore, if religion is removed, so too will the “heartless
world be removed:
·
He also advocated mass murder and terrorism as
being the key practice of Communism, being directly inspired by the Reign of
Terror during the French Revolution. As he told Frederick Engels in their
correspondences: “There is only one way of shortening, simplifying, and
concentrating the bloodthirsty death-throes of the old society and the bloody
birth pangs of the new--revolutionary terror. . . . [...] Once we are at the
helm, we shall be obliged to reenact the year 1793 [the bloody French
revolution]. [...] We are pitiless and we ask no pity from you. When our time
comes, we shall not conceal terrorism with hypocritical phrases. . . The
vengeance of the people will break forth with such ferocity that not even the
year 1793 enables us to envisage it.” (Conservapedia)
Marx was not an anomaly. Militant atheism has come to be
closely associated with all forms of repression. Atheist Gordon Stein wrote:
·
Atheism has long ceased to be a rare and
oft-ignored philosophical outlook...It has transformed itself into an active
political programme with clear objectives which, though they vary from state to
state, unequivocally include the elimination of state religion, religious
education, and the enshrinement of scientism. (Encyclopedia of Politics and Religion, 74).
It was atheism that had emboldened both the French and
Communist revolutions. Understandably, Marx had been a Darwinist:
·
"Darwin's book is very important and serves
me as a basis in natural science for the class struggle in history."
How does the atheistic embrace of Darwinism play out? Dr.
Carl Wieland published an article entitled “The Blood-Stained Century of Evolution”:
·
Communism also took evolution to its logical
conclusion. If everything just evolved from “natural law,” then man's opinion,
not God's Word, determines what is right and wrong. If the working class can
take power by armed struggle, then this is 'right,' regardless of how many must
die to bring in the socialist paradise. Communism's death toll far outranks the
Nazis'—probably more than 90 million worldwide.
As Wieland argued, atheism used Darwinism to justify genocide:
·
Some have suggested that the bloodthirsty deeds
of Stalin were an 'aberration' from the revolution's ideals. However, it was
Lenin, the 'father' of the Russian revolution, who 'perfected the science of
mass killings,' and total, merciless brutality as the ultimate method of
political control. Evolution was the chief tool used to brainwash communism's
masses into 'scientific atheism.' If everything just evolved, then everything
is at the whim of the most powerful, and there is no Maker to whom to be
answerable. Hence Stalin’s belief that killing millions of people was no worse
than mowing your lawn (grass is our cousin in evolutionary doctrine).
Wieland pointed to the fact that Mao also killed his
millions through the inspiration of atheism and Darwinism:
·
Mao's reign of terror and lies resulted in the
deaths of tens of millions. It is no coincidence that his two favorite books
were by the evolutionists Darwin and Huxley. With millions dying from his forced
famine, his physician records that Mao said, 'We have so many people we can
afford to lose a few.' His successors have since persecuted and killed hundreds
of thousands more.
It seems that the communists were all atheists, and they
regarded atheism as inseparable from communism. The evil capitalist were
supported by religion, and so religion had to go:
·
Lenin agreed with Marx that "Religion is
opium for the people. Religion is a sort of spiritual booze, in which the
slaves of capital drown their human image, their demand for a life more or less
worthy of man." As far as Lenin was concerned, it was quite understandable
why the oppressed turn to religion: "Impotence of the exploited classes in
their struggle against the exploiters... inevitably gives rise to the belief in
a better life after death "
·
It seemed equally clear to Lenin why the
capitalists turned to religion: [They] "are taught by religion to practice
charity while on earth, thus offering them a very cheap way of justifying their
entire existence as exploiters and selling them at a moderate price tickets to
well-being in heaven."
·
Like Engels and Marx, Lenin believed that
religion was an historical phenomenon, tied to the oppressive structures of
human history such as feudalism and capitalism…In Lenin's words, "the yoke
of religion that weighs upon mankind is merely a product and reflection of the
economic yoke within society."
·
Lenin cites Marx and Engels that due to the fact
that religion has deep roots in capitalist oppression, it will not disappear
until the people completely overcome their oppression: He writes in The Attitude of the Workers' Party to
Religion that "No educational book can eradicate religion from the
minds of masses who are crushed by capitalist hard labour, and who are at the
mercy or the blind destructive forces of capitalism, until those masses
themselves learn to fight this root of religion, fight the rule of capital in
all its forms, in a united, organised, planned and conscious way." (http://sfr-21.org/lenin-religion.html)
This would justify the use of any form of terror. Consequently,
atheism has often been an engine for mass extermination. Nobel Prize winner
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was asked to account for the great tragedies that
occurred under the atheistic Soviet communist regime. He explained:
·
Over a half century ago, while I was still a
child, I recall hearing a number of old people offer the following explanation
for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: “Men have forgotten God; that's
why all this has happened.”
·
Since then I have spend well-nigh 50 years
working on the history of our revolution; in the process I have read hundreds
of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies, and have already
contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the
rubble left by that upheaval. But if I were asked today to formulate as
concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous revolution that swallowed
up some 60 million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat:
“Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.” (Humber, Paul G. “Stalin's
Brutal Faith,” Institute for Creation
Research)
We often forget that Adolph Hitler was also a socialist –
remember National Socialism – who
hated religion, especially Christianity. In this regard, economist Thomas
Sowell had argued that both Mussolini and Hitler had been embraced by the Left:
- In Germany, the Nazis followed in the wake of the Italian Fascists, adding racism in general and anti-Semitism in particular, neither of which was part of Fascism in Italy or in Franco’s Spain. Even the Nazi variant of Fascism found favor on the Left when it was only a movement seeking power in the 1920s.
Both Sowell and Jonah Goldberg (“Liberal Fascism”)
associated Fascism with the Left:
- Fascism was not only looked on favorably by the Left but recognized as having kindred ideas, agendas, and assumptions. Only after Hitler and Mussolini disgraced themselves, mainly by their brutal military aggressions in the 1930s, did the Left distance itself from these international pariahs. Fascism, initially recognized as a kindred ideology of the Left, has since come down to us defined as being on “the Right” — indeed, as representing the farthest Right, supposedly further extensions of conservatism. If by conservatism you mean belief in free markets, limited government, and traditional morality, including religious influences, then these are all things that the Fascists opposed just as much as the Left does today. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/223648/who-fascist-thomas-sowell
Who was Hitler’s god and how did this affect his political
agenda? In his new book, “Hitler’s
Religion,” historian Richard Weikart attempts to pinpoint the beliefs had
been central to Hitler’s worldview and his genocidal rampage. He identifies
Nature:
·
Since Hitler thought that nature was God, he
believed that morality was defined by conforming to nature’s laws. One of the natural laws he thought most
important was the Darwinian struggle for existence, which produced evolutionary
progress. Since the struggle in nature
was vicious and resulted in the strong destroying the weak, Hitler considered
it good and right to viciously destroy the weak. He thought this would bring about a better
world with superior humans. He thought
he had divine approval for annihilating the allegedly inferior races and people
with disabilities.
The 20th century has often observed a strong association
between atheism, Darwinism, communism, and genocide. Perhaps we need to take
note of this.
No comments:
Post a Comment