A recent video places Sweden as the rape capital of the
world.
A 2013 Front Page article had placed Sweden as number two:
- Sweden now has the second
highest number of rapes in the world, after South Africa, which at 53.2
per 100,000 is six times higher than the United States. Statistics now
suggest that 1 out of every 4 Swedish women will be raped.
- With Muslims represented in as many as 77 percent of the rape cases and a major increase in rape cases paralleling a major increase in Muslim immigration, the wages of Muslim immigration are proving to be a sexual assault epidemic by a misogynistic ideology.
When someone is seriously ill, he goes for testing to
identify the source of the problem. Without accurate diagnosis, there can be no
meaningful intervention. However, this isn’t happening in Western Europe. (See
both the UK and Norway where Muslim rape of non-Muslims has also reached
epidemic levels.) Instead, the diagnosis is strenuously avoided and even
censured. It is as if the Western nations have a death wish or at least a
virulent case of runaway masochism.
Benedict XVI wrote about this perplexing masochistic phenomenon.
He notes how Western culture, en masse, has turned against itself and its Christian
heritage:
- This case illustrates a peculiar western self-hatred that is nothing short of pathological. It is commendable that the West is trying to be more open, to be more understanding of the values of outsiders, but it has lost all capacity for self-love. All that it sees in its own history is the despicable and the destructive; it is no longer able to perceive what is great and pure…Multiculturalism, which is so constantly and passionately promoted, can sometimes amount to an abandonment and denial, a flight from one’s own heritage. (Quoted by Jean Bethke Elshtain, First Things, March, 2009, 36)
Why has the West “lost all capacity” to appreciate its own
heritage? Why does it punish itself? Author Ayaan Hirsi
Ali, a Somali Muslim turned atheist, shares this insight:
- Liberals in Western politics have the strange habit of blaming themselves for the ills of the world, while seeing the rest of the world as victims. To them, victims are to be pitied, and they lump together all pitiable and suppressed people, such as Muslims, and consider them good people who should be cherished and supported so that they can overcome their disadvantages. The adherents to the gospel of multiculturalism refuse to criticize people whom they see as victims. Some Western critics disapprove of United States policies and attitudes but do not criticize the Islamic world, just as, in the first part of the twentieth century, Western socialist apologists did not dare criticize the Soviet labor camps. Along the same lines, some Western intellectuals criticize Israel, but they will not criticize Palestine because Israel belongs to the West, which they consider fair game, but they feel sorry for the Palestinians, and for the Islamic world in general, which is not as powerful as the West. They are critical of the native white majority in Western countries but not of Islamic minorities. Criticism of the Islamic world, of Palestinians, and of Islamic minorities is regarded as Islamophobia and xenophobia.
Okay, victims are to be pitied, but why at the expense of
the well-being of our own nations? What perverse psychological mechanism is
preventing our elites from valuating and protecting their own people? Do they
feel guilty for the benefits that the West has enjoyed?
Guilt and shame are life-controlling forces. In Healing the Shame that Binds, psychologist
John Bradshaw perceptively wrote:
- When shame has been completely internalized, nothing about you is okay. You feel flawed and inferior; you have the sense of being a failure. There is no way you can share your inner self because you are an object of contempt to yourself…To feel shame is to feel seen in an exposed and diminished way. When you’re an object to yourself, you turn your eyes inward, watching and scrutinizing every minute detail of behavior…This paralyzing internal monitoring causes withdrawal, passivity and inaction. (13)
Bradshaw’s understanding of shame might explain why the West
has been bending its neck before the sword of Islam. Perhaps the West feels
ashamed of its privilege and must atone for it.
Shame had also been a life-controlling and life-diminishing factor
for me. My feelings of unworthiness were so powerful that I couldn’t enjoy
anything. I couldn’t take a shower for more than two minutes. I just didn’t
feel worthy of it. Nor could I spend any money on myself. However, when I did
go without, I felt more worthy. When I didn’t, I felt psychologically threatened,
as if I had done the unpardonable. I was trying to redeem myself. However, when
I came to know my Redeemer Jesus, this bondage began to loosen. Since He paid
the price for my sins, I no longer had to redeem myself.
It seems that we are built with a moral law that tells us
that we are unworthy unless a price is paid for our unworthiness. Some indulge
in self-flagellation; others in self-mutilation; while others pay the price
through compulsive do-gooding and people-pleasing. In any case, we are controlled
by the slave-master “shame.”
I think that this problem has gone viral, as has rape in
many of the Western nations. Why? We have rejected our only protection against
internal accusations of shame and unworthiness – Jesus the Savior – and are
paying the just price for this rejection.
No comments:
Post a Comment