In Shadow of Oz Theistic Evolution and the
Absent God, Wayne D. Rossiter argues that theistic evolution (TE)
compromises the Biblical faith in many ways. He uses the example of Karl
Giberson, the co-founder of The Biologos Foundation whose vision
is to convert the Church to TE:
* Giberson warns, “As soon as we start highlighting specific
places where we think we glimpse God’s handiwork, we open ourselves to the old
‘God of the gaps’ problem.” This is telling. Giberson admits here that theistic
evolutionists are not open to the possibility that any phenomenon is the direct
work of God.
"The old ‘God of the gaps’ problem" is the false
accusation that the God explanation exists only in the remaining gaps left by
naturalistic science. However, as science continues to fill in the gaps of our
knowledge, God will become increasingly more irrelevant.
However, such reasoning is illogical. It wrongly assumes
that God is opposed to science. Instead, God - His creation and His elegant,
universal, and immutable laws - serves as the foundation of science.
Consequently, every finding of science should give credit to its Creator!
Likewise, Rossiter rips into the TE formulation:
* The claim is that, if there is a natural explanation for a
phenomenon, God didn’t (directly) do it. At the same time, we’re not allowed to
invoke God where explanations are lacking (i.e., the “gaps”). Said another way,
if we can explain it, God is unnecessary, and if we can’t explain it today, we
still shouldn’t invoke God, on the off chance an explanation emerges in the
future. This is somewhat like betting on a coin flip where the rules are
heads–I win, and tails–you lose. Both the explained and unexplained phenomena
are off limits. That is, there is no situation where the agency of God can be
invoked.
Hence, God has been eliminated by TE fiat. However, since
the evolutionist cannot offer any evidence that anything is caused naturally
and unintelligently, we can just as easily indict the TE position with the
charge of "naturalism of the gaps."
No comments:
Post a Comment