Clearly, many of the Apostles did die as martyrs, without any
historical evidence that any had ever reneged on their faith and their
certitude about the Resurrection of their Master.
However, Sean McDowell has written that the historical
record about the martyrdom of some the Apostles isn’t compelling. Why not? Some
of the historical evidence doesn’t appear until hundreds of years after the
fact.
Nevertheless, McDowell argues that their martyrdom isn’t
absolutely critical to their testimony to the Resurrection. Why not? McDowell
explains that their outspoken lives were always lived facing martyrdom and cites
historian Michael Licona:
·
“After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured
persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their
conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to
them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly
endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.” (Christian Research Journal, Vol.39,
No.2, 16)
According to McDowell, the entire Christian community had
also been convinced of the Resurrection:
·
From the Apostles forward, there is no evidence
for an early Christian community that did not have belief in the Resurrection
at its core. The centrality of the Resurrection can be seen by considering the
earliest Christian creeds, the preaching in Acts, and the writings of the apostolic
fathers. (14)
McDowell cites NT scholar James Dunn in support:
·
“It is an undoubted fact that the conviction
that God had raised Jesus from the dead and had exalted Jesus to his right hand
transformed Jesus’ first disciples and their beliefs about Jesus.” (14)
Could they ALL have
been deluded or just mistaken?
No comments:
Post a Comment