Today, I moderated a discussion on a debate between John
Lennox and Peter Atkins (Atheist). Atkins and perhaps all of the atheists acknowledge
that we are surrounded by the appearances of (intelligent) design. However,
Atkins maintained that once we study the sciences, we find better explanations
for design than ID.
However, what scientific facts are able to overthrow the
design (ID) hypothesis? Evolution is generally cited, but even if
macro-evolution happened, how does the atheist discount the possibility that
God might have had a hand in directing evolution? They cannot!
This means that the ubiquitous appearances of design are
still best explained by our senses, which acknowledge a Designer.
No comments:
Post a Comment