In a New York Times
article, “‘I’ve Become a Racist’: Migrant Wave Unleashes Danish Tensions Over
Identity: The thousands of Muslim asylum seekers pouring into Denmark have
spawned a backlash, and questions over whether the country has a latent racial
hostility at its core” (Sept. 5, 2016), there was no mention of Islamic
violence. However, it is clear that Denmark is also being plagued by Islamic
contempt and disdain for the Danish people as is occurring in other Western
nations:
·
"Crime rates broken down by nationality in
Denmark show that individuals from Muslim countries make up eight of the top
nine places on the list. In addition, 2012 figures show that Somalis were
sentenced for crimes, including innumerable sexual assaults, almost ten times
more often than those with Danish citizenship. Indeed, more than half of all
convicted rapists in Denmark have an immigrant background, according to
official statistics, despite the fact that immigrants and their descendants
account for less than 10 per cent of the population. “Iraqis, Iranians, Turks
and Somalis are dramatically overrepresented among convicted rapists in
Denmark,” reports BT.dk." (http://www.infowars.com/feminists-mute-on-muslim-rape-epidemic-sweeping-europe/)
Clearly, Islamic violence is not a national phenomenon. It
is a religious phenomenon.
Is it so unusual and unacceptable that Danes do not want to
be raped and beheaded and to be placed under shariah law? Is it racist to want
to see peace and harmony prevail? However, The NYT and other mainline media
outlets act as if it is.
No comments:
Post a Comment