Showing posts with label Monism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Monism. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

THE UNQUESTIONED ACCEPTANCE OF BUDDHISM AND MEDITATION




Religion and religious statements are unavoidable. Even the highly secular New York Times cannot resist affirming explicitly religious beliefs, even when incredible:

·       …in many strands of Buddhism there is a remarkable honesty regarding the implications of salvation. Rather than promising that your life will continue, or that you will see your loved ones again, the salvation of nirvana entails your extinction. The aim is not to lead a free life, with the pain and suffering that such a life entails, but to reach the “insight” that personal agency is an illusion and dissolve in the timelessness of nirvana. What ultimately matters is to attain a state of consciousness where everything ceases to matter, so that one can rest in peace. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/11/opinion/why-mortality-makes-us-free.html

This religious affirmation elicits many questions. The author claims that “there is a remarkable honesty” in “many strands of Buddhism.” What demonstrates its honesty? It seems that the author admits that “nirvana entails your extinction,” but what makes this statement honest? Even more perplexing is what follows. According to the author, “the aim” is to “reach the ‘insight’ that personal agency is an illusion and [will] dissolve in the timelessness of nirvana.” If we have been extinguished, who is it who reaches this “insight.” Certainly not those who have been extinguished! And who is it that experiences reincarnation? An illusion of a personal existence?

The author then claims that “What ultimately matters is to attain a state of consciousness where everything ceases to matter, so that one can rest in peace.” Well, who is that “you” if you no longer exist?

It doesn’t seem to matter at all that Buddhism rests upon a confused and illogical foundation. But Buddhism is a Teflon frying pan, which seems to be unassailable by means of reason and even by experience. Besides, it is hard work. What then is its appeal? The author writes:

·       You engage in meditational practices as a means for the end of deepening your ability to care for others and improving the quality of your life.

But how can meditation and Buddhist thought accomplish this, especially in light of the fact that we are not even individuals now – this is just part of the illusion that we have to transcend – and we will not be individuals in the eternal? Wouldn’t displays of caring just reinforce this illusion?

Some Eastern thinkers claim that it will! Paramahansa Yogananda (1893 –1952), author of “Autobiography of a Yogi,” claimed that even suffering is an illusion (http://www.yogananda-srf.org/):

·       “Then this cosmic movie, with its horrors of disease and poverty and atomic bombs will appear to us only as real as the anomalies we experience at a movie house. When we have finished seeing the motion picture, we will know that nobody was killed; nobody was suffering.”

If suffering is just an illusion, why alleviate it? Why not instead simply teach the sufferer that he is being deluded, and so there is no need to extend him any comfort.

In “The King of Knowledge” by Prabhupada, the founder of the Hare Krishna and International Society of Krishna Consciousness, therefore taught that the alleviation of suffering was counterproductive:

·       The hospital making business is being conducted by the government; it is the duty of a disciple to make hospitals whereby people can actually get rid of their material bodies, not patch them up. But for want of knowing what real spiritual activity is, we take up material activities.

Evidently, his meditative techniques were teaching him that caring was unnecessary. Why then meditate? Has it promoted those nations committed to it? The author seems to think that it is enough to simply mention that Sam Harris is an advocate and practitioner.

Wednesday, June 7, 2017

THE BELIEF THAT WE ARE DIVINE





A new self-realization group was just advertised on MeetUp. It is one of many hundreds, perhaps thousands, of such groups around the New York City area alone. Its claim is quite typical:

·       A glimpse of your True Self, a Reality without fear or obstruction, experiencing bliss and divinity as your very Core. Join for discussion, delicious vegan food, and energy transmission.

I have nothing against vegan food or conversation. However, the claim “experiencing…divinity as your very Core” requires some examination. How would we know when we are experiencing divinity as our very core? None of these groups ever seem interested in providing any evidence that divinity is what we would be experiencing. Perhaps it would just be a matter of wish fulfillment. After all, the idea that we are God is very appealing, especially to us humans who are perpetually seeking anything that will boast our self-esteem.

In fact, a wealth of studies have revealed that we are masters of self-delusion:

·       “In one study of nearly a million high school seniors, 70 percent said they had “above average leadership skills, but only 2 percent felt their leadership skills were below average.” Another study found that 94 percent of college professors think they do above average work. And in another study, ‘when doctors diagnosed their patients as having pneumonia, predictions made with 88 percent confidence turned out to be right only 20 percent of the time.’” (Abcnews.go.com; “Self-images Often Erroneously Inflated,” 11/9/05)

Many such studies demonstrate that self-delusion is pervasive, perhaps even normal. Although we have the inner resources for self-knowledge, we seem to lack the willingness to use them. In “Positive Illusions,” psychologist Shelley Taylor sums up the evidence:

·       “Normal people exaggerate how competent and well liked they are. Depressed people do not. Normal people remember their past behavior with a rosy glow. Depressed people are more even-handed…On virtually every point on which normal people show enhanced self-regard, illusions of control, and unrealistic visions of the future, depressed people fail to show the same biases.” (214)

This demonstrates that these “self-enhancing biases and illusions” are entirely human and serve to explain why we flee from true self-knowledge. It’s just too depressing. We are simply addicted to the pleasure of having an inflated self-esteem, and we will reject anything that might threaten our comfortable addiction. And what can be more self-enhancing that to believe that we are God!

We so love to elevate our self-importance. In light of the reality of pervasive self-delusion, can we trust our “experience of self” and conclude that we are God? Hardly! Nevertheless, on Western college campuses, there are no shortages of students who believe that they are God or god. When I ask them to prove it by just performing a slight miracle, they demur, but this inability doesn’t seem to upset their convictions.

However, the collective wisdom of the ages should give us some hesitation about our convictions about our true identity.

·       “Lying to ourselves is more deeply ingrained than lying to others.”― Fyodor Dostoyevsky

·       “People who believe that they are strong-willed and the masters of their destiny can only continue to believe this by becoming specialists in self-deception.”― James Baldwin, Giovanni's Room

·       “It is a self-deception of philosophers and moralists to imagine that they escape decadence by opposing it. That is beyond their will; and, however little they acknowledge it, one later discovers that they were among the most powerful promoters of decadence.”― Friedrich Nietzsche, The Will to Power

·       “We all practice self-deception to a degree; no man can handle complete honesty without being cut at each turn. There's not enough room in a man's head for sanity alongside each grief, each worry, each terror that he owns. I’m well used to burying such things in a dark cellar and moving on.”― Mark Lawrence, Prince of Fools

·       “So the paradox goes: No man who is really ignorant is ever aware that he is ignorant. That is its finest, most faulty manifestation; there can be no true ignorance without first some claim of intelligence or consciousness, or superiority or enlightenment.”― Criss Jami

Jesus taught extensively about self-deception – our hypocrisy of judging and correcting others, when we are even more self-deceived than they (Matthew 7:1-5). He diagnosed the cause of self-deception, which arises from our love for the darkness of self-deception:

·       And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil. For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed. (John 3:19-20)

It might even be worse today. We are taught that believing in ourselves and elevating our self-esteem, apart from any consideration of the truth, is a virtue. We are told, “If it works for you, go for it.” It seems that the test of our beliefs is whether or not it makes us feel good, at least temporarily.

However, there is always a cost for believing the lie. If we do not see accurately, we will eventually crash. What do we tell our wife when she accuses us of treating her badly?

·       We are God. Anything else is illusion, or
·       You need to experience “divinity as your Core.” Evidently, you haven’t experienced it yet.

Neither response will promote reconciliation. Psychologist Roy Baumeister had extensively researched the relationship between high self-esteem and performance, suggesting that there are hidden costs:

·       Recently, though, several close analyses of the accumulated research have shaken many psychologists’ faith in self-esteem. My colleagues and I were commissioned to conduct one of these studies by the American Psychological Society, an organization devoted to psychological research. These studies show not only that self-esteem fails to accomplish what we had hoped, but also that it can backfire and contribute to some of the very problems it was thought to thwart. Social sector organizations should therefore reconsider whether they want to dedicate their scarce resources to cultivating self-esteem. In my view, there are other traits, like self-control, that hold much more promise. (http://imaginefirestone.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/RethinkingSelf-Esteem.pdf)

If you are God, there is no longer a need to learn or investigate. Everything you need is found within. However, there are important lessons to be gained by investigating the nations that have lived with such beliefs for centuries.

In “The King of Knowledge,” a very literalistic commentary on the Bhagavad-Gita, Prabhupada, the late head of the Hare Krishna Vishnavite sect of Hinduism characteristically wrote:

·       The hospital making business is being conducted by the government; it is the duty of a disciple to make hospitals whereby people can actually get rid of their material bodies, not patch them up. But for want of knowing what real spiritual activity is, we take up material activities.

However, if we believe that the only reality is spiritual or that we are all God, then we have eliminated any rationale for attending to the needs of others, especially if our physical bodies are real but illusions that interfere with the spiritual.

How had this thinking affected its place of birth – India? In “The Book that Made your World: How the Bible Created the Soul of Western Civilization” Indian scholar and Christian convert, Vishal Mangalwadi, wrote about the negative effects of Hinduism on India:

·       Our monks did not develop technical aids to improve their eyesight. They took pride in closing even perfectly good eyes in meditation. (108)

If this material world is illusory and the only reality (monism) is that we are part of the universal God-Consciousness, these ideas put the kibosh on learning and technology:

  • This attitude toward knowledge could not create and sustain an academic culture where peers and students could challenge, reject, and improve the medical techniques they had received. Thus, India had intellectual giants but our religious tradition failed to build academic communities. Individual genius, knowledge, and excellence in technology are insufficient to build a medical center. (311)

Mangalwadi also claims that Indian religions couldn’t provide an adequate rationale for compassion – a necessary pre-condition for the practice of medicine:

  • A person’s suffering was believed to be a result of her or his karma (deeds) in a previous life. In other words, suffering was cosmic justice. To interfere with cosmic justice is like breaking into a jail and setting a prisoner free. If you cut short someone’s suffering, you would actually add to his suffering because he would need to come back to complete his due quota of suffering. (312)

Ideas come with a hidden price-tag, and in regards to monism, the price is devastating. Believing that we are God might be self-elevating at first, but so too are street drugs. Only later will they demand payment.

Thursday, September 22, 2016

THE UNSATISFIED HUNGER OF A PANTHEIST





A pantheist believes that everything is God and that we are also God- just one reality. Nevertheless, one pantheist wrote:

* You are not here accidentally -- you are here meaningfully. There is a purpose behind you. The whole intends to do something through you.

But if the "whole intends to do something through you," there are at least two intelligent and willful people involved. Therefore, I responded:

* If we are all one, there cannot be Another who loves us, plans for us, guides us, protects us, and enters into a relationship with us.

The pantheist wants it both ways. He wants to be God and wants Another to watch out for him. However, he cannot have both.

The pantheist is like a hungry man who wants to eat but has an aversion to food. Such are those who want the things of Christ but have no taste for Him.

Friday, June 10, 2016

DOES THE BELIEF THAT WE ARE ALL ONE PRODUCE COMPASSION?




 The woman confidently informed us that the answer to our present lack of compassion is that we are ignorant of the fact that we are all One. This is a common notion among monists, those who believe that we are all One (God) without distinction

Self-Realization Fellowship (SRF) is a worldwide spiritual organization founded by Paramahansa Yogananda in 1920. It had successfully repackaged monism (pantheism) for Western consumption as natural and scientific. Consequently, SRF’s statement of purpose alluringly reads:

  • To disseminate among the nations a knowledge of definite scientific techniques for attaining direct personal experience of God.

  • To teach that the purpose of life is the evolution, through self-effort of man's limited mortal consciousness into God Consciousness; and to this end to establish Self-Realization Fellowship temples for God-communion throughout the world, and to encourage the establishment of individual temples of God in the homes and in the hearts of men.

  • To reveal the complete harmony and basic oneness of original Christianity as taught by Jesus Christ and original Yoga as taught by Bhagavan Krishna; and to show that these principles of truth are the common scientific foundation of all true religions. http://www.yogananda-srf.org/

Of course, “science” is not consistent with monistic Hinduism and Buddhism, which denies the reality of the physical world. Rather, the physical world and its dualistic thinking (thinking in terms of me and them) is all part of the illusion. Therefore, to be invested in understanding the physical world is to be invested in a consuming illusion, which produces ignorance.

In “The King of Knowledge,” a very literalistic commentary on the Bhagavad-Gita, Prabhupada, the late head of the Hare Krishna Vishnavite sect of Hinduism characteristically wrote that sex must be minimized:

  • “Sex pleasure binds us to this material world…You can get yourself married and live peaceably with one woman, but the wife should not be used as a machine for sexual gratification. Sex should be restricted to once a month and only for the propagation of children.”

There is little room for compassion and mercy, since these too bind us to the illusion of other distinct people. Therefore, Prabhupada wrote:

  • “The hospital making business is being conducted by the government; it is the duty of a disciple to make hospitals whereby people can actually get rid of their material bodies, not patch them up. But for want of knowing what real spiritual activity is, we take up material activities.”

Why this detachment from the physical world? To minimize any attachment to it! What then could be the monistic justification for science? If the physical world is illusory, then any involvement in it would contribute to the influence of the illusion.

Even helping someone to come to “awareness” to “get rid of their material bodies” is dualistic and is based on the “illusion” that there are separate beings who need to come to “awareness.” Some have it and some don’t (dualism). However, this contradicts the notion that all is God and all is One.

It is impossible to live in a consistent manner with the idea that the entire physical world is not real. Not only does it undermine any basis for compassion, but also any activity in the physical world.

Oddly, even Yogananda–-the “champion” of science—believed that the physical world is make-believe. According to him, the pantheistic God created this world of illusion for entertainment:

  • Look upon life as a movie, and then you will know why God created it. Our problem is that we forget to see it as God’s entertainment. ....Then this cosmic movie, with its horrors of disease and poverty and atomic bombs, will appear to us only as real as the anomalies we experience in a movie house. When we have finished seeing the motion picture, we know that nobody was killed; nobody was suffering.

If our involvement in this physical world is no more than watching a movie in which “nobody was killed; nobody was suffering,” then any act of compassion to alleviate suffering would be equivalent to trying to rescue the damsel-in-distress in the movies. Instead, she is only there for our entertainment. Likewise, our families and neighbors are no more than entertainment. They are not real. Therefore, any act of compassion towards them is also unreal and even foolhardy.
 
For Yogananda, ignorance is a matter of seeing others as separate from ourselves:

  • “Ignorance, which produces the idea of separate existence of self...is the source of Ego, the son of man.”

  • “When the developments of ignorance are stopped, man gradually comprehends the true character of this creation of Darkness, Maya, as a mere play of ideas of the Supreme Nature on His own Self, the only Real Substance.”

  • “Just as there appear many images of the one sun, when reflected in a number of vessels full of water, so is mankind apparently divided into many souls, occupying these bodily and mental vehicles, and thus outwardly separated from the one universal Spirit. In reality, God and man are one, and the separation is only apparent.”

If the “separation [among people] is only apparent,” then giving a cup of water to the thirsty is an act of ignorance. In contrast, coming to the awareness that there is only One Being or Reality is both salvation and nirvana:

·       “Man is thus saved when he sheds his ignorance of his divine identity and attains Christ consciousness. Salvation equals self-realization.”

·       Self-realization is the knowing on all levels of our being — body, mind, and soul — that we are now in possession of Divinity and therefore need not pray that it come to us; that we are not merely near God at all times but that His omnipresence is our omnipresence; and that He is just as much our essential life now as He ever will be. All we have to do is improve our knowing.

However, salvation for the SRF and other monists is detachment from the world of illusion. In “Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance,” Robert M. Pirsig’s main character, Phaedrus, studying at Benares Hindu University and spiritually searching, asks a question that changes his life:

  • But one day in the classroom the professor of philosophy was blithely expounding on the illusory nature of the world for what seemed the fiftieth time and Phaedrus raised his hand and asked coldly if it was believed that the atomic bomb that had dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were illusory. The professor smiled and said yes. That ended the exchange… He left the classroom, left India and gave up.

Phaedrus could not deny the great tragedy. In contrast to this understanding of life as illusion, “Jesus wept” in the midst of human suffering:

  • When Jesus saw her weeping, and the Jews who had come with her also weeping, he was deeply moved in his spirit and greatly troubled. And he said, “Where have you laid him [their dead brother Lazarus]?” They said to him, “Lord, come and see.” Jesus wept. (John 11:33-35; ESV)

How had monism affected its place of birth – India? This might tell us a lot about how it might affect our own lives. In “The Book that Made your World: How the Bible Created the Soul of Western Civilization” Indian scholar and Christian convert, Vishal Mangalwadi, wrote about the negative effect of Hinduism on India:

  • Our monks did not develop technical aids to improve their eyesight. They took pride in closing even perfectly good eyes in meditation. (108)

If this material world is illusory, then compassion, work and technological advancement are counter-productive. However, it was technology - and theology that inspired it - that had saved the West. Mangalwadi gives several examples:

  • The peasants’ humble wheeled plow generated the economic strength that helped save Europe from colonization by Islam. During the Middle Ages, Islamic forces were able to invade Europe almost at will. Muslims conquered southern Spain and Portugal and invaded France in the eighth century. In the ninth century, they conquered Sicily and invaded Italy, sacking Ostia and Rome in 846. By 1237, they had begun to conquer Russia. Constantinople was captured in 1453, and the battles of 1526 in Hungary and 1529 in Vienna suggested that it was merely a matter of time before the mullahs, caliphs, and sheikhs would rule cities like Rome, Vienna, and Florence. Equipped with a coulter, a horizontal share, and a moldboard, Europe’s new plow increased productivity by tilling rich, heavy, and badly drained river-bottom soil…The net result was the gradual elimination of starvation, the improved health of the people, and a strengthening of the economic foundations of the West relative to Islam. (101-102)

Monism also turns its eyes away from evil and corruption as illusory. Mangalwadi provides an illuminating example from his own country. In 1631, the monsoon failed to come. Consequently, there was a great famine. A British traveler relates the devastation he saw:

  • From Surat to this place all the highway was stowed with dead people, our noses never free from the stink of them…women were seen to roast their children…a man or a woman no sooner dead but they were cut in pieces to be eaten. (112)

Mangalwadi reasons:

  • My people did not starve because they were stupid, lazy, or unproductive. Instead, immorality killed them! They were taxed 80% of their produce. This left them with little and nothing to store for an emergency. The only way for the people to have any money was to join their exploiters.

Monism failed to identify evil and, consequently, was unable to confront it. Those who want to consider monism as the road to compassion must take a hard look at its historical record and not just what is currently trending in the West.