Most recently, Chick-Fil-A (CFA) has been accused of “hate
speech.” Why? Because CFA have been open about their Biblical belief in
exclusively heterosexual marriage. According to many championing the gay
agenda, this automatically means that CFA hates gays! Somehow, non-agreement
has been magically translated as “hate.”
Do these “champions” actually see things this way or is this
just propaganda? After all, in order to be consistent, they should also call President
Obama’s words “hate speech.” Why? Because he wants to raise taxes on the rich and not others! Does this mean that
he hates the rich? I wouldn’t say so. It seems that he too has become pretty
wealthy.
Meanwhile, the Republicans want to limit government. Does
this mean that they hate government workers? Of course not!
Interestingly, there are gays who are becoming quite troubled by these “hate speech” charges. One gay writes:
- My name is Matt. I'm approaching 20 years old. I am a liberal and a supporter of Barack Obama in 2012. What's more is that I am gay and I support Chick-Fil-A… those running the corporations (like Dan Cathy CEO of Chick-Fil-A) have a right to express their beliefs. It has always been an area that causes me to respect Chick-Fil-A when they close on Sundays for the only purpose of retaining personal convictions over profit motives. Mr. Cathy has been unfairly attacked for his statement that he doesn't support same-sex marriage. As a gay man I say let him not support gays. When the gay community and gay activist groups push on anti-gay people and organizations to change their minds and opinions via bullying or forced involvement I fear it would make whatever accomplishments taste cheap like a greasy coin. Ultimately the acceptance of the gay community and the right of gays to marry will not be achieved through violent means, physical and verbal, but through peaceful and honest negotiations…How would you feel if Governor Jan Brewer of Arizona, a well known Republican and Christian, told all gay business owners and workers that they could not get a job in the state because their beliefs did not match the beliefs of the state? We would call it unfair and a violation of our civil rights. Why then is it okay for a mayor to tell a company they cannot open business in the city simply because our beliefs differ?
Sadly, Matt makes far more sense than our media and
universities – and these should have a vested interest in the free exchange of
ideas - that have jumped on the “hate speech” bandwagon.
No comments:
Post a Comment