The author “Liz” is trying to Biblically justify
homosexuality. She writes:
“Jesus teaches us that
loving each other is far more important than strictly following Jewish laws.” https://serendipitydodah.wordpress.com/2017/02/27/the-clobber-verses/
While Jesus did teach love, He clearly has a different understanding
of love than does Liz. He also required us all to repent of our sins:
·
And he answered them, “Do you think that these
Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans, because they
suffered in this way? No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all
likewise perish. Or those eighteen on
whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them: do you think that they were
worse offenders than all the others who lived in Jerusalem? No, I tell you; but
unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.” (Luke 13:2-5)
This is also true of sexual sins:
·
“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not
commit adultery.’ But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with
lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.” (Matthew
5:27-28)
Jesus warned a woman caught in adultery to “go and sin no
more” (John 8:11). If adultery was wrong in Jesus’ eyes, then also the practice
of homosexuality, which is consistently condemned in the Bible.
Following the lead of others, Liz also tries to claim that
the sins of Sodom didn’t include homosexuality:
“The sin of Sodom is
about hard-heartedness, abuse, insult to the traveler, and inhospitality to the
needy (Helminiak, pg. 46), not about committed homosexual relationships that
exist today.”
The sin of Sodom was also about homosexual rape. The Book of Jude is particularly revealing
about Sodom’s sin:
·
Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them
in a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to sexual immorality
and gone after strange flesh (“perversion;” NIV), are set forth as an example,
suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. (Jude 7)
Besides, my homosexual friend has confided (along with
others) that there is no such thing as a sexually monogamous male homosexual
marriage.
Liz also tries to minimize the warnings against
homosexuality in the Book of Leviticus
as just a cultural requirement of that time:
To Bible readers of
today, the word “abomination” [used in Leviticus 18 and 20 regarding
homosexuality] conjures up disgust,
horror, or evil, but to the ancient Hebrews the word we translate as
“abomination” simply meant unclean, taboo, or forbidden.
However, the context of these two sets of verses argues against
a limited cultural interpretation and in favor of a permanent and universal
one:
·
“And you shall not lie sexually with your
neighbor’s wife and so make yourself unclean with her. You shall not give any
of your children to offer them to Molech, and so profane the name of your God:
I am the LORD. You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an
abomination. And you shall not lie with any animal and so make yourself unclean
with it, neither shall any woman give herself to an animal to lie with it: it
is perversion. Do not make yourselves unclean by any of these things, for by
all these the nations I am driving out before you have become unclean.” (Leviticus
18:20-24)
This passage equates homosexuality with adultery, child
sacrifice, and bestophilia. From all indications, these practices continue to
be abominations before God. Besides, contrary to Liz, they applied to all
peoples. The last verse indicates that these prohibitions also applied to all
the surrounding nations. This was why the Lord was going to destroy them.
The next set of verses associates homosexuality with the
same perversions as above:
·
“If a man commits adultery with the wife of his
neighbor, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death. If
a man lies with his father’s wife, he has uncovered his father’s nakedness;
both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them. If a man
lies with his daughter-in-law, both of them shall surely be put to death; they
have committed perversion; their blood is upon them. If a man lies with a male as with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death;
their blood is upon them. If a man takes a woman and her mother also, it is
depravity; he and they shall be burned with fire, that there may be no
depravity among you. If a man lies with an animal, he shall surely be put to
death, and you shall kill the animal. If a woman approaches any animal and lies
with it, you shall kill the woman and the animal; they shall surely be put to
death; their blood is upon them. (Leviticus 20:10-16)
Liz then claims that Paul was speaking only against uncommitted sexual relationships and not the committed
form that we see today:
“But these were not the committed homosexual relationships that we see today. In that culture, their only perspective was that “natural intercourse meant the penetration of a subordinate person by a dominant one.”
“But these were not the committed homosexual relationships that we see today. In that culture, their only perspective was that “natural intercourse meant the penetration of a subordinate person by a dominant one.”
However, there is no textual evidence that Paul was making
this distinction. Instead of a right and a wrong homosexual practice, Paul was
condemning the entire practice of homosexuality
as unnatural:
·
Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their
hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because
they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the
creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen. For this reason
God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural
relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up
natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another,
men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due
penalty for their error. (Romans 1:24-27)
Homosexuality represents a perversion of the intended gift
of sexuality. Therefore, any who practice homosexuality are punished with “the
due penalty for their error.” In fact, there is not a verse in the entirety of
Scripture that would give the slightest allowance for even committed homosexual
relationships.
Liz and those whom she cites are clearly more concerned
about pushing this militant agenda than with any concern about faithfulness to
the Word of God.
How then should the Christian love the gay person? The same way
that God does, by pleading with them to turn from their sins, the same thing
that we all must do!