Sunday, May 31, 2020

MARTIN LUTHER, THE PEASANT REBELLION, AND MINNEAPOLIS


In May 1525, Luther wrote Against the Rioting Peasants against the Peasant Rebellion (1524-26), whose leaders had even been appealing to the Scriptures and the Reformers to justify their violence in the pursuit of “justice”:

·       The peasants have taken upon themselves the burden of three terrible sins against God and man; by this they have merited death in body and soul... they have sworn to be true and faithful, submissive and obedient, to their rulers... now deliberately and violently breaking this oath... they are starting a rebellion, and are violently robbing and plundering monasteries and castles which are not theirs... they have doubly deserved death in body and soul as highwaymen and murderers... they cloak this terrible and horrible sin with the gospel... thus they become the worst blasphemers of God and slanderers of his holy name.

Luther justified the use of lethal force by the German princes against the peasants, citing Paul’s teaching on the role of the civil authorities to maintain order:

·       Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God’s wrath but also for the sake of conscience. (Romans 13:1-5)

According to Luther, God had placed the sword into the hands of the princes to keep order and not into the hands of the mob. In an open letter to Caspar Muller, entitled An Open Letter on the Harsh Book Against the Peasants. Luther also advised that it is the duty of a Christian to "suffer injustice, not to seize the sword and take to violence."

How does this apply to Minneapolis? The murder of a cuffed black man by a police officer is horrible, but this does not justify mob violence. Instead, as imperfect as justice and the courts might be, they remain the far better solution than the judgments of the mob.

“Stand-down” orders represent the betrayal of public trust and welfare. Instead, it is the justice system that must maintain peace, order, and to protect the innocent against the violence of the mob and rogue cops. When the justice system betrays this trust, it longer has the authority to insist that the public should not defend themselves.

A system which refuses to fulfill its role extends an invitation to a run-on-guns, vigilantism, civil war, and a breakdown of everything that God values. What then must the justice system do? Far more than they have been doing! Any form of unlawful violence must be effectively addressed.

It is not a matter of compassion to stand-down before the mob. It is insanity, the destruction of a city and even of a society. Instead, in this case, the highest form of compassion is the maintenance of justice and the protection of the innocent in the face of a blood-thirsty mob. Compassion then is a matter of using the least lethal force to accomplish justice, peace, and protection, whatever the cost. Anything less is a betrayal and an encouragement to mob destruction.

Saturday, May 30, 2020

DOUBTFUL AND STRESSED ABOUT DECISIONS





Do you get stressed-out about making decisions? Are you preoccupied with making the right decisions for the Lord? Often, we get obsessed about the “enough questions”:

·       Am I praying enough?
·       Giving enough?
·       Ministering enough?
·       Studying the Bible enough?

Because the Bible doesn’t provide us with precise answers to our various questions, we can drive ourselves crazy with our fears and doubts.

However, I think that the Bible does give us the guidance we require. First of all, as Jesus had taught, it is essential that we have devoted ourselves to both Him and His wisdom, above all else:

·       “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied.” (Matthew 5:6 (ESV); 6:33; John 7:17)

When we trust in the Lord, we will put His concerns above every other concern. However, if there is a sin we have reserved for ourselves, it is an area where we have decided to trust in ourselves above the Word of God. It becomes a cancer that corrupts everything else. Paul had warned that “A little leaven [sin] leavens [corrupts] the whole lump” (Galatians 5:9).

How does this happen? This leaven or yeast has the power of affecting everything else. It deceives us and corrupts our thinking (Romans 7:11; Hebrews 3:13). When we sin, we are convicted and feel guilty. If we don’t confess it to our Savior, we feel compelled to justify or suppress it, where it festers. Consequently, we build a wall against the Spirit’s convicting influence. However, God offers us a way to be restored to sanity and to the Spirit’s guidance:

·       Do not be conformed to this world [and its temptations], but be transformed by the renewal of your mind [through the Word], that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect. (Romans 12:2)

Discerning God’s will is largely a matter of rejecting the temptations of the world and the flesh. We also must confess our sins:

·       If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. (1 John 1:9)

As often as we sincerely do this, we are not only forgiven but also cleansed and restored to a state of holiness. This enables us to escape from the blinding power of sin. We don’t have to first pay atonement for our sins through good deeds and even suffering. Instead, it is the good pleasure of our God to restore us immediately through the once-and-for-all atonement of the Cross. Any attempt to pay the price ourselves is a denial of the great sacrifice of love that the Lord has provided through His death.

Once we have rejected our sinful double-mindedness, He gladly promises us the wisdom that we need:

·       If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives generously to all without reproach, and it will be given him. (James 1:5-8)

However, we must seek this wisdom above our on comforts and pleasures:

·       yes, if you call out for insight and raise your voice for understanding, if you seek it like silver and search for it as for hidden treasures, then you will understand the fear of the LORD and find the knowledge of God. For the LORD gives wisdom; from his mouth come knowledge and understanding; he stores up sound wisdom for the upright; he is a shield to those who walk in integrity, guarding the paths of justice and watching over the way of his saints. (Proverbs 2:3-8)

You might still be asking, “Where is His promised wisdom? I am still groping for answers.” I have been so comforted by His promise that if we are missing something and are going in the wrong direction, He will show us:

·       Let those of us who are mature think this way, and if in anything you think otherwise, God will reveal that also to you. Only let us hold true to what we have attained. (Philippians 3:15-16)

I am no longer tormented by the questions, “Am I praying enough or doing enough?” Instead, I trust that God is leading me in the right direction and will show me when I am not, even though it might seem that I am passing through the “Valley of the Shadow of Death.” Even there, I am assured:

·       He restores my soul. He leads me in paths of righteousness for his name’s sake. Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for you are with me; your rod and your staff, they comfort me. (Psalm 23:3-4)

Nevertheless, I am sure that I don’t pray enough. I jump ahead and make decisions without first asking for the Lord’s guidance. However, the Lord hears my request for help in this area, and I’m committed to go wherever He might lead, as I trust in His guidance, even as I continue to fall far short in this area.




Thursday, May 28, 2020

Evangelical-Bashers in an Age of “Tolerance”




The Bible warns that who believe in Jesus and follow His teachings will be hated by the world:

·       Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, while evil people and impostors will go on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. (2 Timothy 3:12-13)

However, it is even more difficult for us to bear what has become increasingly manifest - our own “brethren” hate us, as Jesus had warned:

·       “Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and put you to death, and you will be hated by all nations for my name’s sake. And then many will fall away and betray one another and hate one another.” (Matthew 24:9-10)

The evidence of those who profess Christ turning against their brethren is rampant. In a Sojourners magazine article (5/11/20), D.L. Mayfield has joined a multitude of other evangelical-bashers in “sighting” the worst expressions of evangelicalism concerning the coronavirus:

·       “It’s not that I don’t want people healthy, it’s that I don’t want my freedom taken from me,”

·       “Freedom is more important than your life. Or my life,”


These saying make us seem to be uncaring of the welfare of our neighbors. However, evangelicals instead say something more nuanced, like:

·       Christian love has to take precedence over every other concern. However, to determine what love looks like in the face of covid-19, is difficult to do. There are many imponderables that we must take into account. We have to weigh the potential costs of the virus against the costs entailed by closing down the economy and the losses of freedom.

Of course, such calculations are highly difficult to make. However, Mayfield uses these sayings to accuse Christians of seeking “their own personal rights and liberties” instead of seeking solidarity with “the entire community”:

·       Had American Christians completely lost the ability to recognize the need for solidarity in the face of a global pandemic? Through decades of advocating for their own personal rights and liberties, had they become incapable of working toward the common good — prioritizing the well-being of the entire community instead of just themselves?

Solidarity is a good thing when the strategy is good and proven. (Why isn’t Mayfield concerned about her solidarity with other Christians?) However, this is a question where differences of opinion should be tolerated. I’m sure that there are “Christians” who are selfishly seeking their own welfare, but are we more guilty of this than are others? According to Mayfield, we are! How does she come to this calculation? Instead, of statistics, she heaps one charge on top of the next, claiming that we are illegitimately mistrustful of government and prone to conspiracy theories:

·       I was raised in an [evangelical] culture steeped in conspiracy theories and a distrust of the government, but even this went too far for me.

Perhaps there are sound reasons to distrust our government officials, the media, and the morality being purveyed by Hollywood. Nevertheless, Mayfield wildly charges us with the hypocrisy endemic to the Constitution:

·       The inherent contradictions of the evangelical political mind is baked into the U.S. Constitution itself: Americans are entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness so long as you are a white, land-owning male.

This is a wild racist charge. Such a damning charge would ordinarily require a lot of corroborating evidence. However, Mayfield offers nothing apart from her own observations. The fact that she would dare to make such a charge stems from the fact that the media routinely denigrates evangelicals. Hence, she is a single voice among a vast choir of compatriots, who evidently believe that there is safety in numbers rather than in the facts.

Meanwhile, amidst this torrent of bad press against evangelicals, Mayfield ironically charges that we blindly regard ourselves as a “persecuted minority.” Just try to think of a Hollywood film or series that paints evangelicals in a positive light! Nevertheless, she accuses us as having “a distrust of institutions and powers.” This would be like charging Jews for being distrustful of Nazis. She concludes:

·       This…community now regularly makes headlines for acting in ways that do not benefit the most vulnerable, or ways that call on us to love our neighbors as ourselves.

Smacked down with such unfair allegations, should Mayfield be surprised that we are distrustful? However, loving-evangelicals falls far outside of her professed concern “to love our neighbors.” Even in this age of “tolerance,” it has become entirely acceptable to trash one particular community, ironically, a community committed to love, as many studies have shown. Of course, we fall far short of the example of Jesus, but does this make us hypocrites? To add insult to injury, Mayfield also censures us for our “distrust” of commentators like her.

*****

A favorite ploy of the evangelical- bashers is to equate us with Pharisees, like those who opposed Jesus. In one instance, Jesus had healed a crippled woman,

·       And he laid his hands on her, and immediately she was made straight, and she glorified God. But the ruler of the synagogue, indignant because Jesus had healed on the Sabbath, said to the people, “There are six days in which work ought to be done. Come on those days and be healed, and not on the Sabbath day.” (Luke 13:13-14 ESV)

Heartless? Yes! It’s not every day that the sick can come and get healed. Besides, should the Sabbath day take precedence over the healing of a desperate woman, who had suffered for 18 years? No! But this is how the world chooses to portray the evangelical, as heartless, brainless hypocrites, who are more concerned about trivial rules than about loving others. In contrast, Jesus is regarded as a loving and tender-hearted shepherd, who is willing to break the rules.

However, these aren’t accurate characterizations. For one thing, Jesus was a stickler on the laws/teachings of the Bible, which He never violated. Instead, He taught that we must live according to every one of God’s Words:

·       “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.’” (Matthew 4:4; 5:17-18)

Instead of denigrating the Law, Jesus always sought to interpret it according to its deeper sense:

·       “Or have you not read in the Law how on the Sabbath the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath and are guiltless? I tell you, something greater than the temple is here. And if you had known what this means, ‘I desire mercy, and not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the guiltless.” (Matthew 12:5-7)

Jesus correctly insisted that there are some considerations greater than Sabbath Day observances, namely mercy! Nevertheless, Jesus was a model of fidelity to the law, the Words of God. This is not pharisaic.

It is also wrongly assumed that the Pharisees had been faithful observers of the Law. While they made a splendid superficial show of living by the Law, according to Jesus, they were hypocrites:

·       “For if you believed Moses, you would believe me; for he wrote of me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe my words?” (John 5:46-47)

Why then were they esteemed as faithful interpreters and keepers of the Law of Moses? According to Jesus, their observance was all just a hypocritical self-centered show:

·       “They do all their deeds to be seen by others. For they make their phylacteries broad and their fringes long, and they love the place of honor at feasts and the best seats in the synagogues and greetings in the marketplaces and being called rabbi by others.” (Matthew 23:5-7) 

Even in our previous context, the religious leadership demonstrated their hypocrisy, since they too worked on the Sabbath:

·       Then the Lord answered him, “You hypocrites! Does not each of you on the Sabbath untie his ox or his donkey from the manger and lead it away to water it?  And ought not this woman, a daughter of Abraham whom Satan bound for eighteen years, be loosed from this bond on the Sabbath day?” (Luke 13:15-16)

In contrast to the Pharisees, evangelicals strive to put the Lord and His Word first in their lives (Matthew 6:33; John 14:21-24). In this we struggle to not succumb to the temptations to win the esteem of others. Instead, we struggle to put our Savior first in all things. Many of us do not look very impressive on the outside (1 Corinthians 1:26-29). We often come from broken backgrounds and lack education and the respect of the community, but why are we so widely hated, even by those who call themselves “Christian?”

Ed Stetzer serves as a dean at the formerly evangelical Wheaton College and is an evangelical basher. In Christianity Today, he has written:

·       Christians are disproportionately fooled by conspiracy theories. I’ve also said before that when Christians spread lies, they need to repent of those lies. Sharing fake news makes us look foolish and harms our witness. https://www.christianitytoday.com/edstetzer/2020/april/christians-and-corona-conspiracies.html

Are we more fooled by fake news than others? Seeing how our society has largely been taken captive by the mainstream media, it would seem that Stetzer’s charge is unsustainable. Besides, “being fooled by conspiracy theories” is in opposition to Stetzer’s charge that we are lying.

What evangelicals are facing had often been highlighted by our Master:

·       “If the world hates you, know that it has hated me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love you as its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you.  Remember the word that I said to you: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you. If they kept my word, they will also keep yours.” (John 15:18-20)

Our persecutors will even be convinced of the righteousness of their cause:

·       “Indeed, the hour is coming when whoever kills you will think he is offering service to God. And they will do these things because they have not known the Father, nor me.” (John 16:2-3)

In contrast, the Pharisees of Jesus’ day were held in the highest esteem. They occupied the best seats and were distinguished by the highest levels of education and eloquence. However, we are to rejoice in the midst of persecution, as Jesus had explained:

·       “Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.” (Matthew 5:10-12)

How should we understand the increase of Christian-bashing, especially in the West? Jesus had explained, “The world…hates me because I testify about it that its works are evil” (John 7:7). We have observed that the more the West departs from its Christian roots the more it will hate biblical morality and feel condemned by it.

Wednesday, May 27, 2020

NO DISCUSSIONS OF POLITICS OR RELIGION




Many MeetUp discussion groups are promoting rules like these:

·       *No discussions of politics or religion!
·       *No judgement and be accepting of other group members!

While these groups explicitly state that they want to bring people of diverse points of view together, these rules guarantee that only those who share the prevailing secularized religion will find a seat at these tables.

These groups certainly have a right to set their rules and to include and exclude those who do not fit into their membership requirements, whether they intend their group to only be for pregnant mothers or the transgendered. I would just ask them to be transparent about their intentions.

To give a more extreme example, some groups merely say, “No proselytizing.” However, this prohibition is generally understood to apply only to Christians. This prohibition is never applied in an unbiased manner. I say this because everyone is proselytizing in one manner or another. Everyone has their point of view, which they want others to value or even accept, even if it is only a matter of, “Look how bright (or learned or nice or congenial) I am!” However, even if they are merely selling themselves, they will never be accused of “proselytizing” or of trying to win others to themselves.

Well then, what’s wrong with the prohibition against “discussions of politics or religion?” If this injunction was merely against uncivil, heated, and disrespectful discussion of these topics, I’d certainly agree with it.

However, these prohibitions amount to “viewpoint discrimination.” Let me try to explain. Everyone has their set of values, beliefs, or even religions. I have gone to several mental health support groups. It is common to hear participants encouraging others with statements like, “You can do it.” Can we really do it? Isn’t this based upon the belief that we can change ourselves or at least our feelings and reactions! Or “You can be whatever you want to be. You’ve just got to believe in yourself!” Perhaps such value-laden admonitions are merely laying an extra weight upon our shoulders, giving us another goal by which to fail.

More to the point, is this message any less religious than, “You’ve got to believe in God?” Hardly! Nevertheless, the mental health community and worldview are committed to a religion of self-help, group-help, or psycho-therapeutic help but not to God-help. Consequently, I am frequently silenced and reminded that, “Not everyone here believes in God.” Essentially, what they are saying is that, “You’ve got to believe like the rest of us, or you have no place here.”

If they would merely advertise their group as, “This is just for people who are willing to believe in themselves and not in God,” I’d have no objection. We should have this right. However, the truth be told, we’d prefer to not be unmasked and our blatant biases revealed. Instead, we want to think of ourselves as open-minded and accepting of all comers. Rather, today’s secularism leaves little room for oppositional points of view.

If secularism wants to promote a Gulag of group-think, it should be explicit about this. It should not hide itself behind a banner of “neutrality,” “tolerance,” and “compassion” with rules like, “No judgement and be accepting of other group members!” Is secularism really accepting?