Ian Mevorach calls himself a “Christian Minister,” but
insists that:
- The time has come for
Christians to recognize how wrong we have been in these assessments [about
Muhammad as a false prophet] and to correct the record by affirmatively
identifying Muhammad with “the Spirit of Truth” [as Jesus taught in John
14 -16].
Mevorach claims that he is writing to:
- Open the minds of Christians
to receive a future revelation not as something that competes with or
diminishes the Gospel, but rather as something that glorifies Jesus.
Unfortunately, these words in the Gospel of John have been totally missed
by Christians who reject and belittle the Qur’an; we have for the most
part completely ignored the unity of the Gospel and the Qur’an in terms of
their common revelatory source. However, if we take Jesus’ words
seriously, we have the opportunity to receive the Word of God in the
Qur’an in accordance with Jesus’ promise that the Spirit of Truth “will
take what is mine and declare it to you.”
Could Jesus have possibly been referring to Muhammad in John
14-16? Well, let’s take a look:
- “If you love me, you will
keep my commandments. And I will ask the Father, and he will give you
another Helper, to be with you forever, even the SPIRIT OF TRUTH, whom the
world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him. You know
him, for he dwells with you and will be in you.” (John 14:15-17)
Did Muhammad “dwell with” the Israelites and would he “be in
you?” Even Muslims would deny this. Would Muhammad “be with you forever?”
Certainly not!
- “But the Helper, the Holy
Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things
and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.” (John 14:26)
Did Muhammad bring to remembrance “all things… that I have
said to you?” Certainly not! The Qur’an even denies Jesus’ teachings about
dying for the sins of the world and being the “Son of God.”
- “But when the Helper
comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who
proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness about me. And you also will
bear witness, because you have been with me from the beginning.” (John
15:26-27)
Instead, Muhammad bore witness to a different Jesus, denying the Crucifixion, the Deity of Christ, and
salvation through Him:
- [Qur’an 4.157] And their
saying: Surely we have killed the Messiah, Isa son of Marium, the apostle
of Allah; and they did not kill him nor did they crucify him, but it
appeared to them so (like Isa) and most surely those who differ therein
are only in a doubt about it; they have no knowledge respecting it, but
only follow a conjecture, and they killed him not for sure.
- [5:75] They do blaspheme
who say, “God is Christ, the son of Mary” …Whoever joins other gods with
God – God will forbid him the Garden and the fire will be his abode.
- [3:85] If anyone desires a
religion other than Islam, never will it be accepted of him; and in the
hereafter, he will be in the ranks of those who have lost (all spiritual
good).
Mevorach acknowledges that Jesus’ references to the “Spirit
of Truth” refer to the Holy Spirit but later, they refer to Muhammad:
- The major objection to
applying these predictions to Muhammad or any other prophet is that
Christians normally read them as part and parcel of Jesus’ promise of the
gift of the Holy Spirit… But as Jesus’ farewell discourse proceeds these
titles become multivalent and, in John 15:26-27 and 16:7-15, they begin to
refer more to a future prophet than to the Holy Spirit.
What Mevorach is asking us to believe is absurd. It would be
like writing a story about the passing of you “mother” and then, without any
indication otherwise, you are referring to “Mother Teresa.” However, Jesus gave
no indication that the “Spirit of Truth” would gradually refer to Muhammad. In
support of this theory, Mevorach cites Jesus in John 16:
- “I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them
now. When the Spirit of Truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth;
for he will not speak on his own, but will speak whatever he hears, and he
will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me,
because he will take what is mine and declare it to you. All that the
Father has is mine. For this reason I said that he will take what is mine
and declare it to you.” (John 16:12-15, NRSV)
How is Muhammad a fulfilment, since Muhammad didn’t “declare”
the biblical Jesus? Instead of glorifying Jesus, Muhammad detracted from Jesus,
denying His Deity, Sonship, and even the moment of His greatest glory:
- And Jesus answered them,
“The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified. Truly, truly, I say
to you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains
alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit. Whoever loves his life loses
it, and whoever hates his life in this world will keep it for eternal
life.” (John 12:23-25)
Besides, Jesus insisted that “All that the Father has is
mine.” However, if Muhammad is the greater prophet, who surpasses even Jesus,
this assertion cannot be truth.
Yet, Mevorach insists that John 16 provides us with an unmistakable portrait of
Muhammad, but how? The verses prior to the ones he cites provide addition
problems for Mevorach:
- Nevertheless, I tell you
the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go
away, the Helper [Muhammad] will not come to you. But if I go, I will send
him to you. And when he comes, he will convict the world concerning sin
and righteousness and judgment.” (John 16:7-8)
How was Muhammad able to convict the world of sin? Was he as
omnipresent as the Spirit? (omnipresence would be a requirement for anyone who
was going to convict the world of sin!) Instead, of convicting the world of
sin, his teachings have led to endless wars for world conquest, causing Islam
to be called the “Ultimate Killing Machine.”
In addition to this, Jesus insisted that the “Spirit of
Truth,” the Helper, would come when Jesus would leave and would teach His
Apostles what they “cannot bear” to hear when Jesus was with them. However,
Muhammad did not come until almost 600 years later and was not received by the
people of Jesus, let alone did Muhammad ever instruct His Apostles.
What evidence does Mevorach have to claim that these
teachings are fulfilled by Muhammad? Why not the head of the Mormons, Jim
Jones, or David Koresh? Mevorach can offer only the Qur’an, a book compiled 600
years after Jesus:
- For centuries Muslim
interpreters have seen Muhammad as this “Advocate,” based on Qur’an 61:6,
a verse in which Jesus predicts the coming of a future prophet named
Ahmad: “O Children of Israel! Truly I am the Messenger of God unto you,
confirming that which came before me in the Torah and bearing glad tidings
of a Messenger to come after me whose name is Ahmad.”
However, 600 years earlier, the Holy Spirit came upon the
Christian Church, transforming a fearful group of people into bold ambassadors
for Christ – people that Islam had to put to death by the millions in order to
secure their ends. And their genocide continues today under the names of ISIS,
Islamic Jihad, Boko Haram, Al Nusra, Al Qaeda, and many other groups, all
assured that, according to their holy writings, they are serving Allah.
Meanwhile, Muslims in the West use other means. Mevorach
assures us that fear and threat are not at all at stake here, just friendly
persuasion:
- Based on the promises of
Jesus, Christians can encounter the Qur’an without fear, knowing that it
is a revelation which glorifies Jesus and, in a spiritual sense, is from
him.
You might then ask, “How can Mevorach call himself a “Christian
minister? Easy! Islam is a religion of deception (Taqiyya). Even friendship is
to be used as a tool of deception:
- [Qur’an 3:27] Let not the
believers take the disbelievers for friends rather than believers. And
whoever does this has no connection with Allah unless it is done
[deceptively] to guard yourselves against them, guarding carefully.
- [5:54] O ye who believe,
take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors. They
are but friends and protectors to each other.
- [60:1] “O you who believe!
Take not My enemies and your enemies (i.e. disbelievers and polytheists)
as friends, showing affection towards them, while they have disbelieved in
what has come to you of the truth”
- [60:4] “Indeed there has
been an excellent example for you in Ibraaheem (Abraham) and those with
him, when they said to their people: ‘Verily, we are free from you and
whatever you worship besides Allaah, we have rejected you, and there has
started between us and you, hostility and hatred for ever until you
believe in Allaah Alone’”
How do Muslims understand these verses? This is an important
question, since Western Muslims will claim that this is all just a matter of
interpretation. Therefore, it cannot be taken literally. However, one representative
commentator writes (www.koranqa.com; fatwa 59879):
- “Undoubtedly the Muslim is
obliged to hate the enemies of Allaah and to disavow them, because this is
the way of the Messengers and their followers.
- “Based on this, it is not
permissible for a Muslim to feel any love in his heart towards the enemies
of Allaah who are in fact his enemies too. Allaah says”:
- “But if a Muslim treats
them with kindness and gentleness in the hope that they will become Muslim
and will believe, there is nothing wrong with that, because it comes under
the heading of opening their hearts to Islam. But if he despairs of them
becoming Muslim, then he should treat them accordingly.”
What does it mean to treat them accordingly? In order to
answer this question, we have to understand the overall thrust of Islam – for the
entire world to live in submission to Islam, by persuasion or by bloodshed.
Ibn Khaldun, the 15th century Tunisian historian, states:
- In the Muslim community,
the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the
Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everybody to Islam either by
persuasion or by force... Islam is under obligation to gain power over
other nations.
Here’s the Koranic basis for this:
- [Qur’an
8:37] Make war on them until idolatry is no more and Allah’s religion
(Islam) reigns supreme.
- [4:5] When the Sacred Months are over, kill
those who ascribe partners [like Jesus] to God wheresoever ye find them;
seize them, encompass them, and ambush them; then if they repent and
observe prayer and pay the alms, let them go their way.
- [Qur’an
8:12, cp. 8:60] Strike off the
heads of the disbelievers,” “Kill the disbelievers wherever we find them”
(2:191) and “murder them and treat them harshly” (9:123).
The West regularly hosts many interfaith discourses,
thinking that these will promote friendship and harmony, as evidenced by this
Mevorach’s article in the Huffington
Press. However, the West is merely providing a platform for a deception of
the unwary, a platform gladly embraced by every Islamist. Meanwhile, such
discussions cannot occur in the Islamic world without heads rolling. Perhaps
this should tell us something about the true intents of Islam.
