Monism, the belief that we all are one and part of a
god-consciousness, has become increasingly popular on college campuses. Why?
Isn’t it apparent that we are all distinct individuals who fall far short of
godhood? Well, these students are convinced that the dualists – and those to
see distinctions are dualists – are deceived.
This belief is expressed in many ways. In the Bhagavad-Gita, the Lord Krishna consoled
the grieving Arjuna, who had been born into the warrior caste. His duty,
therefore, was to fight, but he couldn’t accept the idea of fighting against
the opposition, many of whom were family. Therefore, the esteemed Lord Krishna
explained:
- “You have grieved for those who deserve no grief… Neither for the living nor the dead do the wise grieve.” (2:11)
Why do not the wise grieve? Because the “wise” understand
that they are just grieving over a passing illusion, and enlightenment has no
place for grieving. This was also the understanding of the Self-Realization Fellowship started in the USA by Paramahansa
Yogananda in1920:
·
“Man is thus saved when he sheds his ignorance
of his divine identity and attains Christ consciousness. Salvation equals
self-realization.” http://www.yogananda-srf.org/
Since our senses deceive us, we fail to recognize our “divine
identity.” Consequently, we remain ignorant and equate truth (enlightenment)
with what we see. Instead, we are to understand that what we see is no more
than a movie:
·
“Then this cosmic movie, with its horrors of
disease and poverty and atomic bombs will appear to us only as real as the
anomalies we experience at a movie house. When we have finished seeing the
motion picture, we will know that nobody was killed; nobody was suffering.”
Both Hindu and Buddhist monism (oneness) preach renunciation
of the deceptive influences of this world – work, commitments, enjoyments, and
even family and friends – the things that blind us to our shared god-nature or “Christ-consciousness.”
Instead, many others have concluded that the deception reigns within this “enlightened”
consciousness.
In “Zen and the Art of
Motorcycle Maintenance,” Robert M. Pirsig’s main character, Phaedrus,
studying at Benares Hindu University, asks a question that changes his life:
- But one day in the classroom the professor of philosophy was blithely expounding on the illusory nature of the world for what seemed the fiftieth time and Phaedrus raised his hand and asked coldly if it was believed that the atomic bomb that had dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were illusory. The professor smiled and said yes. That ended the exchange… He left the classroom, left India and gave up.
Phaedrus could not deny the great tragedy. In contrast to
this understanding of life as illusion, “Jesus wept” in the midst of human
suffering:
- When Jesus saw her weeping, and the Jews who had come with her also weeping, he was deeply moved in his spirit and greatly troubled. And he said, “Where have you laid him [their dead brother Lazarus]?” They said to him, “Lord, come and see.” Jesus wept. (John 11:33-35; ESV)
Jesus had compassion, even though this tragedy was soon
reversed when Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead. But isn’t compassion a part
of Hinduism and Buddhism? Perhaps superficially, but monism represents a denial
of our individuality and suffering. These too are part of the illusion.
In “The King of
Knowledge,” a very literalistic commentary on the Bhagavad-Gita,
Prabhupada, the late head of the Hare Krishna Vishnavite sect of Hinduism
characteristically wrote:
- The hospital making business is being conducted by the government; it is the duty of a disciple to make hospitals whereby people can actually get rid of their material bodies, not patch them up. But for want of knowing what real spiritual activity is, we take up material activities.
Although our students believe that monistic “enlightenment”
promotes compassion, it is this very thinking that argues against compassion.
To show compassion to an illusory other person is to reinforce the dualistic illusion.
Besides, their suffering is no more real than a movie, right?
However, if the self is part of the illusion, what then
becomes subject to the wheel of reincarnation? The “logic” of monism denies the
existence of a self, which undergoes reincarnation. Besides, there does not
exist a monistic mechanism to weigh our karma to determine our appropriate next
reincarnation. Such would involve a dualistic distinction. However, these
contradictions are of little concern to our future leaders.
No comments:
Post a Comment