A recent barna.org survey found that:
·
…almost half of practicing Christian Millennials
say evangelism is morally wrong. Our recent report “Reviving Evangelism”…points
to a stark gap between who non-Christians want to talk to about faith and the
Christians they actually know.
·
Nearly all non-Christians and lapsed Christians
(identify as Christian but have not attended church within the past month) have
a friend or family member who practices and prioritizes Christianity—but these
believers may not be their ideal conversation partners when it comes to faith.
For instance, more than six in 10 non-Christians and lapsed Christians (62%)
say they would be open to talking about faith matters with someone who listens
without judgment—the top quality they value—but only one-third (34%) sees this
trait in the Christians they know personally. Similarly, their hopes of talking
with Christians who do not force conclusions (50% [want to talk to Christians] vs.
26% [who regard their Christian associates in this manner]), demonstrate
interest in other people’s stories (29% vs. 17%) and are good at asking
questions (27% vs. 16%) appear to go unfulfilled. https://www.barna.com/research/non-christians-faith-conversations/?mc_cid=8a6b08815b&mc_eid=51f2c94633
Let’s be somewhat hesitant to conclude that these non- and
lapsed-Christians (NLCs) are open to finding the truth about God. Barna also
found that only 15% were interested in talking to Christians who exhibited a “vibrant
faith.” It would seem that if someone was truly seeking, they would want to
talk to someone who seemed to have found something. If I had a medical problem,
I would want to talk to someone with expertise in the area. However, this doesn’t
seem to be the case with many who want to talk about spirituality. Why not?
Perhaps, rather than finding answers, they just want to share their thoughts
and feelings with an attentive non-professional but caring “psychotherapist.”
There is nothing wrong with this. If the situation permits,
the Christian evangelist needs to know who they are talking to. This suggests
that we should first listen, show interest, and inquire in a non-judgmental
manner, but we should not hesitate to present our perspective when the
opportunity presents itself. Admittedly, the Gospel will seem judgmental and
coercive to many spiritual conversationalists. However, our conversation should
be primarily governed by the Biblical realities like:
·
For the word of the cross is folly to those who
are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God...we preach
Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to those
who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of
God. (1 Corinthians 1:18, 23-24)
In light of this overriding truth, we cannot allow ourselves
to be unduly influenced by the desires of the spiritual consumer. We have to
accept the fact that “the cross is folly to those who are perishing.”
Nevertheless, I don’t think that we should go to the other
extreme and ignore Barna’s conclusion:
·
Christians’ ability to witness for Christ may be
impeded by the simple fact that they don’t have meaningful relational
connections with non-Christians, or the conversational skills necessary to talk
meaningfully about faith.
However, I think that evangelism is even more impeded by our
lack of knowledge and confidence in the Gospel, which inclines us to
defensiveness and discomfort when sharing. Besides, every situation is different and requires its own special approach. Therefore, let prayer and the Spirit be your guide.
No comments:
Post a Comment