According to Marvin Olasky, it seemed that the Jews of the
early 20th Century were on the verge of abandoning Judaism, allegedly
because they could no longer believe in the supernatural. What to do? Remake
Judaism into a more acceptable form to agree with the present tastes:
·
A book published 85 years ago -- Jewish
Theological Seminary professor Mordecai Kaplan’s “Judaism as a Civilization” --
led many Jews away from Judaism…Kaplan before World War II went on speaking
tours, praising Judaism as a fine result of natural human development rather
than divine inspiration. He said the Hebrew Bible was not God’s Word, merely a
key document in the evolving religious civilization of the Jewish people.
Noah’s flood was not a mega-drowning but a writer’s device to get our attention.
Exodus was a work of fiction rather than an actual history of liberation from
bondage. https://townhall.com/columnists/marvinolasky/2019/09/22/vanishing-dance-lessons-on-the-decline-of-liberal-judaism-n2553147
Of course this “solution” appealed to many of Kaplan’s ilk
who wanted to retain to formal connection to “Judaism,” but was it still the
religion of the Hebrew Scriptures? This solution might have “worked”
temporarily, but it served as a mere ‘gateway drug” to agnosticism and atheism.
Olasky wrote that although Kaplan had been resisted by the Orthodox Jews, he
pressed on:
·
The forecast of the Orthodox rabbis was right.
Kaplan’s “Reconstructionism” did not satisfy. The sect still has a minor
presence in Judaism, but most rebels against Orthodox Judaism did not get off
at the Reconstructionist bus stop. One of my cousins became a Jubu, trying to
meld Moses and Buddha. Many became atheists. Some, surprised by Christ, became
evangelicals (like me) or -- like Robert Novak and Hadley Arkes -- Catholics.
This should be a lesson for Christian evolutionists, who
claim to be saving Christian college students from abandoning their faith by
presenting a way to embrace both evolution and the Bible. However, the Bible
and the faith that it teaches have been severely compromised in the process, as
one former co-head of the Biologos
Foundation; Karl Giberson, admits:
·
Acid is an appropriate metaphor for the erosion
of my fundamentalism, as I slowly lost confidence in the Genesis story of
creation and the scientific creationism that placed this ancient story within
the framework of modern science….[Darwin’s] acid dissolved Adam and Eve; it ate
through the Garden of Eden; it destroyed the historicity of the events of
creation week. It etched holes in those parts of Christianity connected to the
stories—the fall, “Christ as the second Adam,” the origins of sin, and nearly
everything else that I counted sacred. (Saving
Darwin: How to be a Christian and Believe in Evolution, 9-10)
Then, Giberson claimed that this was the extent of Darwin’s dissolving
power. However, a couple of years later, he admitted that he no longer believed
in the vengeful God of the Hebrew Scriptures. In his case, Christian evolution (CE)
was a “gateway drug” to unbelief. However, from my discussions with many CEs,
it seems that they too were following Giberson’s example. When I’d confront
them with the many interpretative problems created by CE, they would counsel me
to be humble about my faith. I only pray that they would be as humble about
evolution.
No comments:
Post a Comment