THE BATHROOM BILL AND A LETTER TO A KINDRED SPIRIT

My Dearest Stalina,

I just couldn’t wait to share with you the good news. I’ll just quote it to you from one of those whimpering Catholic news services:

·       “The Justice Department filed a lawsuit today stating that North Carolina has violated federal civil rights laws by overturning ordinances mandating that transgender people can use the restroom and shower facilities of the opposite biological sex.” https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-attorney-general-sues-north-carolina-likens-restroom-laws-to-jim-c

Obama really jammed them up, don’t you think? After all, who can fight the Fed? Obama will just bleed NC to death with legal costs. (I don’t even what to pronounce the name of that horrid state.) After the people realize that they stand to lose billions of dollars, they will hang their governor and put terror into any other state that attempts to resist us.

I just love what our dear Loretta dumped on them:

·       “Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced the federal case at a press conference late this afternoon, likening laws that bar biological males from using female showers to Jim Crow laws and segregation measures that forced blacks to use separate drinking fountains.”

I just love her strategy—likening the transgendered using womens’ bathrooms to blacks not using white facilities. But that’s not the best of it. She rubbed NC’s face in the mud:

·       “It was not so very long ago that states, including North Carolina, had signs above restaurants, water fountains, and public accommodations, keeping people out,” she said.

Do you get the brilliance of this stroke! We can shame anyone into silence who had ever had a bad civil rights record. Once wrong, always wrong! Loretta is telling them that they have no right to speak. They are damned, and, you know the public – they are merely pawns of the media, and we want to keep them that way. And now that the universities, Hollywood, and the mainstream media are all on our side, the enemy is running scared, even the Republican Congress.

Okay, I admit that her reasoning can also be used against us. We too had been wrong, and, therefore, we too could be silenced. However, with all the power elites in our hands, it really doesn’t matter. We are now in the position to get away with almost any manipulation. (I won’t say “lie,” because, well, what is a lie anyway?)

I also love the feigned moral indignation of Vanita’s message:

·       “Vanita Gupta, head of the Justice Department's civil rights division, agreed the lawsuit is about principles of the highest order: ‘I want to make one thing clear,’ Gupta said. ‘Calling H.B. 2 a 'bathroom bill' trivializes what this is all about.’”

Of course, it’s trivial. We’re only talking about far less than 1% of the population, but that’s not even the point. It’s not the point of discrimination against the transgendered. Let me speak honestly with you, even though honesty is something I find little use for, unless to use it to candy-coat a whopper.

Just think of it. It is totally not about discrimination against the transgendered. If it was, the transgendered male-to-female would never want to enter a ladies room. TALK ABOUT DISCRIMINATION! That’s where “she’d” experience discrimination to the max. I’m talking big-time now. Yup! Understandably, “she” always felt more at home in the men’s room. Think of what “she” could see there! And perhaps even make some contacts!

No! As usual, it’s all about politics and steamrolling the public with our sexual agenda to normalize all forms of sex. However, our “bathroom bill” takes our strategy to the next level. It tells females that they have no right to their modesty, privacy, and even their sexual taboos. It’s about normalizing any form of sexuality, from children to the near comatose. It’s about making sex as normal as defecating or eating a MacBurger.

I know what you are thinking, Dearest. You are thinking of our ultimate agenda, the quintessence of our godless merry-making –- to entirely discredit the Christian faith and to rid ourselves of all of the infection of its shame and guilt for the things we do.

Let’s admit it, this is our ultimate dream, and it has worked so well. We have succeeded in winning over an entire generation with more to come. How? For one thing, they not only no longer feel comfortable in church, they even feel judged by the church and Christians. How have we done this? Well, we not only made sex seem normal for everyone, but we have also made anyone who resisted opening themselves up to feel like a narrow, closed-minded prude. However, once they enjoy some forbidden fruit and feel guilty about it, they project their guilt upon the church and feel judged by them. So they too begin to conclude that the church is old-fashioned, repressive, and against having a good time.

We’ve also made a virtue out of “exploring sexuality.” Of course, if they didn’t thoroughly enjoy it at first, we’ve convinced them that the fault was with them, and that they needed therapy to recover from their repressive past. And I’m so thrilled that psychotherapists are thoroughly client-centered. They are also committed to the self-centered idea that immediate enjoyment – they call it “self-fulfillment” or “self-actualization – is what life is all about. However, for now, even the churches are falling behind our manipulations. So why interfere with a good thing. So be patient, my Dearest.

Of course, we can heartily embrace that idea, Dearest Stalina! Okay, we’re imposing our own religion on them, our own view of the meaning of life, but it’s all good. Remember, liberation sometimes calls for deception and propaganda.

Just remember that Christianity is the foe, even if we can’t be open about this. It’s easier to win them over with honey than with a whip, but, rest assured, we’ll pull out the whip in due time.

The Progressive Sexual Agenda

According to the Progressive agenda, any form of sex should be taken as casually as eating a Big Mac. Consistent with this vision:

• A new sex education program says that consensual sex between 13-year-olds should be seen as normal, and describes masturbation and attempting to touch other children's genitals is "a safe and healthy sexual development" for children as young as five.

• For 13 to 17-year-olds, green behaviors include "obscenities and jokes within the current cultural norm," "having sexual or non-sexual relationships," "sexual activity including hugging, kissing, holding hands," and "consenting oral and/or penetrative sex with others of the same or opposite gender who are of similar age and developmental ability."

• The final safe option listed for this age group is "choosing not to be sexually active."

• In the newborn-to five-year-old age group the "traffic light tool" gives a green light to "playing with own genitals," "attempting to touch…other children's genitals," and "attempting to touch…breasts, bottoms or genitals of adults."

The welfare of children must have been the prime concern of these educators, yes? Surely, much research must have paved the way to such radical and progressive programs. Certainly, the experts would never subject children to influences that could possibly destabilize, confuse, and even destroy the children along with their familial relationships. It is totally unthinkable that they would have embarked on such a radical course without the support of years of testing the effects of such programs on children!

Sadly, the unthinkable has become highly thinkable in Western society. It is not that there aren’t voices of sanity:

• Dr. David Paton, a professor of industrial economics at Nottingham University and a leading expert in teenage pregnancy rates, has consistently warned that explicit sex education and easy availability of contraceptives, including the morning-after pill, has not led to a decrease in teen pregnancies or abortions, but has led to a staggering increase in STD's because of an increase in sexual activity in children.

• Paton told the education select committee that he has a "big issue" with the guidelines in the "tool" suggesting that sexual relations among 13-to-17-year-olds are a "safe and healthy development."

• "The advice is both misleading and potentially dangerous,” Paton said. "There’s an awful [lot] of evidence that early sexual activity is associated with all sorts of adverse outcomes – including early pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, but also mental health issues and adverse academic outcomes.”

What then drives this radical agenda to normalize all forms of sexuality, even among the youngest and most vulnerable? I think that the answer can be summed up in one word – projection.

We are morally wired to know right from wrong. This includes sexual behavior. Therefore, we feel guilty when we act wrongly sexually. However, it is easier to blame society for our guilt and shame than to blame ourselves. Therefore:

•  “It is society that is wrong. It is our puritanical beliefs that are the source of my inhibitions, sexual dysfunction, and porn-addiction shame and guilt. Society must therefore be changed!”

There is little consideration of the fact that, perhaps, we are constituted in such a way that we need to listen to our conscience for guidance. However, we reject this guidance in favor of an unfounded hope.