THE BATHROOM BILL AND A LETTER TO A KINDRED SPIRIT

My Dearest Stalina,

I just couldn’t wait to share with you the good news. I’ll just quote it to you from one of those whimpering Catholic news services:

·       “The Justice Department filed a lawsuit today stating that North Carolina has violated federal civil rights laws by overturning ordinances mandating that transgender people can use the restroom and shower facilities of the opposite biological sex.” https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-attorney-general-sues-north-carolina-likens-restroom-laws-to-jim-c

Obama really jammed them up, don’t you think? After all, who can fight the Fed? Obama will just bleed NC to death with legal costs. (I don’t even what to pronounce the name of that horrid state.) After the people realize that they stand to lose billions of dollars, they will hang their governor and put terror into any other state that attempts to resist us.

I just love what our dear Loretta dumped on them:

·       “Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced the federal case at a press conference late this afternoon, likening laws that bar biological males from using female showers to Jim Crow laws and segregation measures that forced blacks to use separate drinking fountains.”

I just love her strategy—likening the transgendered using womens’ bathrooms to blacks not using white facilities. But that’s not the best of it. She rubbed NC’s face in the mud:

·       “It was not so very long ago that states, including North Carolina, had signs above restaurants, water fountains, and public accommodations, keeping people out,” she said.

Do you get the brilliance of this stroke! We can shame anyone into silence who had ever had a bad civil rights record. Once wrong, always wrong! Loretta is telling them that they have no right to speak. They are damned, and, you know the public – they are merely pawns of the media, and we want to keep them that way. And now that the universities, Hollywood, and the mainstream media are all on our side, the enemy is running scared, even the Republican Congress.

Okay, I admit that her reasoning can also be used against us. We too had been wrong, and, therefore, we too could be silenced. However, with all the power elites in our hands, it really doesn’t matter. We are now in the position to get away with almost any manipulation. (I won’t say “lie,” because, well, what is a lie anyway?)

I also love the feigned moral indignation of Vanita’s message:

·       “Vanita Gupta, head of the Justice Department's civil rights division, agreed the lawsuit is about principles of the highest order: ‘I want to make one thing clear,’ Gupta said. ‘Calling H.B. 2 a 'bathroom bill' trivializes what this is all about.’”

Of course, it’s trivial. We’re only talking about far less than 1% of the population, but that’s not even the point. It’s not the point of discrimination against the transgendered. Let me speak honestly with you, even though honesty is something I find little use for, unless to use it to candy-coat a whopper.

Just think of it. It is totally not about discrimination against the transgendered. If it was, the transgendered male-to-female would never want to enter a ladies room. TALK ABOUT DISCRIMINATION! That’s where “she’d” experience discrimination to the max. I’m talking big-time now. Yup! Understandably, “she” always felt more at home in the men’s room. Think of what “she” could see there! And perhaps even make some contacts!

No! As usual, it’s all about politics and steamrolling the public with our sexual agenda to normalize all forms of sex. However, our “bathroom bill” takes our strategy to the next level. It tells females that they have no right to their modesty, privacy, and even their sexual taboos. It’s about normalizing any form of sexuality, from children to the near comatose. It’s about making sex as normal as defecating or eating a MacBurger.

I know what you are thinking, Dearest. You are thinking of our ultimate agenda, the quintessence of our godless merry-making –- to entirely discredit the Christian faith and to rid ourselves of all of the infection of its shame and guilt for the things we do.

Let’s admit it, this is our ultimate dream, and it has worked so well. We have succeeded in winning over an entire generation with more to come. How? For one thing, they not only no longer feel comfortable in church, they even feel judged by the church and Christians. How have we done this? Well, we not only made sex seem normal for everyone, but we have also made anyone who resisted opening themselves up to feel like a narrow, closed-minded prude. However, once they enjoy some forbidden fruit and feel guilty about it, they project their guilt upon the church and feel judged by them. So they too begin to conclude that the church is old-fashioned, repressive, and against having a good time.

We’ve also made a virtue out of “exploring sexuality.” Of course, if they didn’t thoroughly enjoy it at first, we’ve convinced them that the fault was with them, and that they needed therapy to recover from their repressive past. And I’m so thrilled that psychotherapists are thoroughly client-centered. They are also committed to the self-centered idea that immediate enjoyment – they call it “self-fulfillment” or “self-actualization – is what life is all about. However, for now, even the churches are falling behind our manipulations. So why interfere with a good thing. So be patient, my Dearest.

Of course, we can heartily embrace that idea, Dearest Stalina! Okay, we’re imposing our own religion on them, our own view of the meaning of life, but it’s all good. Remember, liberation sometimes calls for deception and propaganda.

Just remember that Christianity is the foe, even if we can’t be open about this. It’s easier to win them over with honey than with a whip, but, rest assured, we’ll pull out the whip in due time.

WATCHING THE ADVENT OF UTTER CHAOS

If you had thought that the insanity of our public officials was merely temporary, on March 11, 2016, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio proved you wrong. He issued an executive order giving men the right to use women's bathrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa:

• The mayor's edict is called, "Access to Single-Sex City Facilities Consistent With Gender Identity and Expression."  It means that all New York City single-gender facilities must accommodate both sexes, including city buildings and offices, parks, children's playgrounds, swimming pools, and more, all access given without showing identification or any proof of gender.

• Mayor de Blasio declared that transgenders using opposite sex bathrooms and locker rooms "is a fundamental human right that should not be restricted or denied to any individual." Ironically, he added, "Every New Yorker should feel safe in our city." (LifeSiteNews)

Just wondering how this might play out, accompanied by my wife, I walked up to a security guard standing by the public bathrooms and asked:

• I happen to feel quite feminine today. Would you mind if I used the Lady’s Toilette?

Fortunately, he knew that I was joking with him, laughed, and confessed that this policy had not yet been implemented. When I asked him how he would be able to distinguish the transgendered from a molester, he again laughed helplessly. We both understood that there could be no way to distinguish.

But according to our mayor, this is their “human right.” However, according to another NYC ordinance, it is not our human right to call a transgendered a “he,” when, biologically, the transgendered “she” is a he! Actually, if you do that, it is the “human right” of the city to fine you up to $250,000. I don’t see how this will accomplish our mayor’s goal that "Every New Yorker should feel safe in our city." I don’t feel safe when I have to watch every pronoun that proceeds from my mouth.

But such are “human rights!” I just wonder from where our empathetic mayor derives them. Certainly not from the Constitution or even from our pre-De Blasio statutes! Perhaps he has his own private bible, and perhaps the rest of us have failed to see the light. I just wonder whether it includes something about the human rights of women for privacy and protection against predators and porn-producers. Perhaps our mayor just hasn’t reached that part in his bible yet.

Transgendered and Pat Robertson

 We tend to regard ourselves as “freethinkers.” What we think – our ideas and worldviews – we automatically equate with truth and reality. In doing so, we tend to disregard the influence of the culture that has nurtured our thinking.

One interesting example of this is Pat Robertson, the 83 year-old televangelist. When asked about transgendered people, he answered:

• "I think there are men who are in a woman's body," he said. "It's very rare. But it's true -- or women that are in men's bodies -- and that they want a sex change. That is a very permanent thing, believe me, when you have certain body parts amputated and when you have shot up with various kinds of hormones. It's a radical procedure. I don't think there's any sin associated with that.”

Is it true that “there are men who are in a woman's body?" Well, if this is so, there is absolutely no evidence of this apart from the fact of the say-so of the transgendered themselves.

This reminds me of a Barbara Walters investigative report some years ago. It featured people who were convinced that, although they were born with legs, they were convinced that they weren’t meant to have legs. Consequently, they did everything they could to have their legs removed.

Of course, we regard this as pathological. But why? If we respect the say-so of the transgendered -  that even though they might have a male body, they are really a female – why do we regard those who claim that they are supposed to be without legs as pathological? Culture! The media! The steady drone of a solitary voice saying that it is a human right to be transgendered, even a source of pride! Meanwhile, those who have had their legs removed are regarded as “sick” – no basis for pride there!

Add to the steady drone are the vicious accusations that if you fail to fall in line with this thinking, you lack compassion and sensitivity. Even worse than that, you are a “bigot” and a “homophobe.” Soon, we will also be called “pedophobes!”

Instead, wisdom instructs us to be aware of the messages, influences, and the less-than-subtle messages to conform or else!