How you ever heard scientific creationism or intelligent
design (ID) disparaged as the “Goddidit Theory.” What does this mean? The
evolutionist claims that ID is not science but a veiled way of saying “God did
it. End of story!” as if ID refuses to engage the same evidences as do all
other scientists.
However, this charge can just as easily be reversed into the
“Evolutiondidit Theory.” Nobel laureate in physics, Robert B. Laughlin, wrote:
- Evolution by natural selection, for instance, which Charles Darwin originally conceived as a great theory, has lately come to function more as an antitheory, called upon to cover up embarrassing experimental shortcomings and legitimize findings that are at best questionable and at worst not even wrong. Your protein defies the laws of mass action? Evolution did it! Your complicated mess of chemical reactions turns into a chicken? Evolution! The human brain works on logical principles no computer can emulate? Evolution is the cause! (A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down, New York: Basic Books, 2005, 168-69)
Is there therefore no difference between ID and the theory
of evolution? At its core, ID sets forth an adequate cause to explain all of
the marvelous phenomena of this universe – life, fine-tuning, the laws of
physics, DNA, consciousness, freewill – but evolution can only say “it just
happened naturally!” Naturally? Where did the natural come from?
When God is eliminated, a God-substitute – the natural laws
- must be found! However, what was so wrong with the original?
No comments:
Post a Comment