Some argue that prayer doesn’t accomplish anything, since
God is sovereign and will do what He wants to do according to His plan.
However, the Christian apologist, C.S. Lewis, challenged this “logic”:
·
In every action, just as in every prayer, you
are trying to bring about a certain result; and this result must be good or
bad. Why, then, do we not argue as the opponents of prayer argue, and say that
if the intended result is good, God will bring it to pass without your interference,
and that if it is bad, He will prevent it happening whatever you do? Why wash
your hands? If God intends them to be clean, they’ll come clean without your
washing them. If He doesn’t, they’ll remain dirty…however much soap you use.
Why ask for the salt? Why put on your boots? Why do anything? https://redeeminggod.com/work-and-prayer-by-c-s-lewis/?fbclid=IwAR2AlUetPn7JQA_QTcW8PPt2o7gf8XuZTo8H2trFhpyFOYR9Npjsvt6PTrg
Lewis correctly reasoned that if prayer is ineffective,
there is no reason to think that any form of obedience will be effective in
bringing favorable results:
·
We know that we can act and that our actions
produce results. Everyone who believes in God must therefore admit (quite apart
from the question of prayer) that God has not chosen to write the whole history
with His own hand. Most of the events that go on in the universe are indeed out
of our control, but not all. It is like a play in which the scene and the
general outline of the story is fixed by the author, but certain minor details
are left for the actors to improvise. It may be a mystery why He should have
allowed us to cause real events at all, but it is no odder that He should allow
us to cause them by praying than by any other method.
Even if God has orchestrated all the future, this does not
mean that our prayers and obedient decisions are not effectual. I’d like to
suggest that He uses our freewill prayers and actions to accomplish His
purposes. Lewis acknowledged that we too have a vital role to play:
·
Pascal says that God “instituted prayer in order
to allow His creatures the dignity of causality.” It would perhaps be truer to
say that He invented both prayer and physical action for that purpose. He gave
us small creatures the dignity of being able to contribute to the course of
events in two different ways. He made the matter of the universe such that we
can (in those limits) do things to it; that is why we can wash our own hands
and feed or murder our fellow creatures.
The Bible is an invitation to partake, in a meaningful way,
in the works and intentions of our Lord. Of course, this reasoning coincides
with the counsel of Scripture that prayer does accomplish God’s purposes:
·
The prayer of a righteous person has great power
as it is working. Elijah was a man with a nature like ours, and he prayed
fervently that it might not rain, and for three years and six months it did not
rain on the earth. Then he prayed again, and heaven gave rain, and the earth
bore its fruit. (James 5:16–18)
Is prayer ineffectual? Only when we ask for things that are not
against the Lord’s will:
·
You do not have, because you do not ask. You ask
and do not receive, because you ask wrongly, to spend it on your passions. (James
4:3)
But does this mean that our prayers can change God’s mind?
If God is omniscient, even of all future events, we and our prayers cannot add
anything to His knowledge. Therefore, we offer Him nothing new to consider or
to persuade God to change His mind. However, it is still true that if we do not
ask, we “do not receive.”
No comments:
Post a Comment