Islam’s agenda is world domination, but why are the Western
elites enabling them? In his “must-read” book, Raymond Ibrahim explains:
- Christian persecution is perhaps the most obvious example of a phenomenon the mainstream media wants to ignore out of existence – Islamic supremacism. Vastly outnumbered and politically marginalized, Christians in the Islamic world simply wish to worship in peace, and yet they still are hounded and attacked; their churches are burned and destroyed; their children are kidnapped, raped, and enslaved…they must be subjugated, according to Sharia’s position for all others, for all infidels…If the mainstream media were to report honestly on the persecution of Christians under Islam, the obvious implications that Islam is dangerously hostile to all non-Muslims would be inescapable. Hence, journalists develop an instinct – or make a deliberate choice – to ignore or minimize these uncomfortable facts. (Crucified Again, 232)
Some horrific stories are merely ignored or denied, like
Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti’s statement that it is “necessary to destroy all the
churches” in the Arabian Peninsula (223). Islamic acts of genocide are often
described as “sectarian strife” (227).
What then is the agenda – the cultural bias – of the Western
media? The liberal bias that we can all live peacefully together under
secularism! Ibrahim’s book is partially an expose’ of this faulty,
insupportable narrative:
- The abuse of Christians where Muslims are in power has the capacity to completely undermine the liberal narrative that has dominated politics for decades. Muslim violence in Europe or against Israel poses no challenge to that narrative: in both cases, Muslims are seen as the underdogs, who may be sympathized with no matter how much they lash out. They may be screaming and rioting, firing rockets, and destroying property – all while calling for the death and destruction of the “infidel” West or Israel’s Jews to cries of “Allahu Akbar!” Still the bloodlust can be portrayed as a natural byproduct of the frustration Muslims feel as an oppressed minority, “rightfully” angry with the “colonial” West and its Israeli proxy.
Sadly, many well-meaning Christians are reluctantly complying
with the liberal narrative in hope of not
stirring up more genocidal attacks. Robert McManus, the Roman Catholic Bishop
of Worcester, Massachusetts, stated on February 8, 2013:
- "Talk about extreme, militant Islamists and the atrocities that they have perpetrated globally might undercut the positive achievements that we Catholics have attained in our inter-religious dialogue with devout Muslims."
However, this is reminiscent of the Pope’s misguided
Concordant with Hitler. He had been ignorant of Hitler’s ultimate plans and
thought that he could placate the idealistic Hitler. However, there is no
placating the designs for world domination, especially when it is fueled by a
racism or chauvinism that regards the infidel as worthy of death. This is
something that liberalism refuses to see, as Ibrahim points out in many areas:
- As far as former U.S. president Bill Clinton is concerned, “inequality” and “poverty” are “what’s fueling all this stuff” – a reference to Boko Haram’s jihad to enforce Sharia and eliminate Christians. Clinton further called on Nigerians to “embrace the similarities,” adding, “It is almost impossible to cure a problem based on violence with violence” – apparently a suggestion that Nigeria’s government not retaliate with any severity in response to Boko Haram’s mass murderers. (241)
Denial is not a good way to deal with reality. Denial had
been the solution of Neville Chamberlain. Fortunately, there was also a
Churchill!
No comments:
Post a Comment