Many reject the Bible because of its teachings on male
headship. In Why Modern Patriarchy Is Not
Biblical, Kathryn J. Riss, Th.M. had started out on the wrong foot,
defining patriarchy as “the supremacy of the father.” However, this doesn’t
reflect a Biblical understanding of male headship, which is about role distinction
and not superiority:
·
But I want you to understand that the head of
every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ
is God. (1 Corinthians 11:3)
In the same way that the Father is the head of the Son, the
husband is the head of the wife. However, this is no indication of any
inferiority of the wife. Instead, the Father, Son, and the Spirit are each
completely God. Even though the Son and the Spirit submit to the Father, this
too doesn’t imply inferiority. Similarly, the husband and the wife are equally
created in the likeness of God:
·
So God created man in his own image, in the
image of God he created him; male and female he created them. (Genesis 1:27)
Male and female are equally created in the image of God. Consequently, they have equal value before Him.
However, as we go further into the article, we find that Riss
is not arguing against Biblical patriarchy but against unbiblical perversions
of patriarchy:
·
Women are created with these godly
characteristics just as much as men.
Human sexual differences were created and designed to function for
reproduction, not governance.
Riss correctly points to the Biblical teaching that both were given the mandate to “have
dominion over” the earth:
·
“. . . male and female He created them. God blessed them and said to them, ‘Be
fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over
the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing
that moves upon the earth.’”
Riss again rightly concludes:
·
Therefore, to rob woman of her sovereignty is to
violate her creation as a human being in God’s image and her God-given mandate
to subdue the earth. Like a man, a woman
may use her sovereignty to yield willingly to others, but it should never be
taken away from her.
Although I agree with her, I think that she has taken this
too far. Riss writes:
·
Scripture nowhere directs a husband to rule over
his wife, nor a wife to obey her husband.
Riss then claimed that “the Ten Commandments contain no
directive for wives to obey their husbands or husbands to govern their
wives. The second commandment directs
children to honor both father and mother, showing that the marriage partners
share equal authority over their offspring.” Riss also correctly points out
that:
·
In I. Timothy 3:4, Paul says that a bishop
should be “one that rules well his own household, having his children in
subjection,” not his wife! Verse 12 says that deacons should be “husbands of
one wife, ruling their children and their households well.” Roman husbands were
legally the rulers and judges of all those belonging to their households. Yet, Paul deliberately omits any reference to
Christian husbands ruling over their wives!
However, her next distinction is not substantive:
·
The New Testament instructs wives to “submit” to
their husbands, not to “obey” them. https://godswordtowomen.org/patriarchyriss.htm?fbclid=IwAR1H35qQ7U1BNhSiD1LeLQEUsPvq5ZPc33PTm5_3vY-lVlPAS4O2evCfwCE
However, what does submission mean if not obedience? She claims
that submission only “means to defer
to someone respectfully,” but various passages will not support her distinction:
·
Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the
Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the
church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to
Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands. (Ephesians
5:22-24)
The wife is supposed to submit to her husband as the Church
must submit to Christ. This must include obedience, the mark of respect and
love:
·
Jesus answered him, “If anyone loves me, he will
keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our
home with him. Whoever does not love me does not keep my words. And the word
that you hear is not mine but the Father’s who sent me.” (John 14:23-24)
Consequently, to refuse to obey Jesus is also a refusal to
love and to respect Him. They all go together.
Nevertheless, Riss raises legitimate concerns that
patriarchy can be abused. However, any good thing can be abused – food, drink,
sleep, and even our vital tools can be used destructively. Therefore, we need
to be careful about rejecting something merely because of its potential for
abuse.
Riss, therefore, raises an appropriate warning about the use
of authority:
·
Jesus condemned authority being exercised among
His followers. He said, "The
princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them and they that are great
exercise authority upon them, but it shall not be so among you. But whosoever will be great among you, let
him be your minister, and whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your
servant, even as the Son of Man came not to be ministered unto, but to
minister, and to give his life a ransom for many." (Matthew 20:25-28)
This raises questions about the use of authority, and
rightly calls into question the husband’s use of force to make his wife submit.
The Ephesians 5 passage makes no mention of the husband forcing his wife to
submit. Instead, it is her responsibility to willingly submit obediently to her
husband. Likewise, the husband has been assigned the weightier responsibility
of loving and wife as Christ did for His Church and sacrificing himself for
her:
·
Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the
church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed
her by the washing of water with the word…In the same way husbands should love
their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. (Ephesians
5:25-28)
In light of the husband’s surpassing responsivity and his
determination to fulfill it, many Christian wives have reported that they gladly
submit obediently to such a husband. This is the ideal, and it is mirrored
perfectly in the Trinity. Consequently, Jesus stated:
·
“For I have not spoken on my own authority, but
the Father who sent me has himself given me a commandment—what to say and what
to speak. And I know that his commandment is eternal life. What I say,
therefore, I say as the Father has told me.” (John 12:49-50)
Clearly, there is nothing demeaning in this kind of
submission.
No comments:
Post a Comment