In a New York Times article, “‘I’ve Become a Racist’: Migrant Wave Unleashes Danish Tensions Over Identity: The thousands of Muslim asylum seekers pouring into Denmark have spawned a backlash, and questions over whether the country has a latent racial hostility at its core” (Sept. 5, 2016), there was no mention of Islamic violence. However, it is clear that Denmark is also being plagued by Islamic contempt and disdain for the Danish people as is occurring in other Western nations:
· "Crime rates broken down by nationality in Denmark show that individuals from Muslim countries make up eight of the top nine places on the list. In addition, 2012 figures show that Somalis were sentenced for crimes, including innumerable sexual assaults, almost ten times more often than those with Danish citizenship. Indeed, more than half of all convicted rapists in Denmark have an immigrant background, according to official statistics, despite the fact that immigrants and their descendants account for less than 10 per cent of the population. “Iraqis, Iranians, Turks and Somalis are dramatically overrepresented among convicted rapists in Denmark,” reports BT.dk." (http://www.infowars.com/feminists-mute-on-muslim-rape-epidemic-sweeping-europe/)
Clearly, Islamic violence is not a national phenomenon. It is a religious phenomenon.
Is it so unusual and unacceptable that Danes do not want to be raped and beheaded and to be placed under shariah law? Is it racist to want to see peace and harmony prevail? However, The NYT and other mainline media outlets act as if it is.