As socialism grows in popularity, the socialist has
become more strident about claiming Jesus as one of their own:
- Jesus, if viewed politically, was definately a socialist, possibly an anarchist:
In support, the socialist offered this
"evidence":
- “How hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of God!” (Mark 10:21-23) The capitalist society we live in now is far from Jesus teaching.
However, this verse says nothing in favor of
socialism. Instead, rather than equalizing wealth, it seems that Jesus was ready
to increase the disparity:
- “For to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away.” (Matthew 25:29; ESV)
Jesus found no problem that some would be left with
nothing, while others would have everything:
- “The Son of Man will send his angels, and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all law-breakers, and throw them into the fiery furnace. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. He who has ears, let him hear." (Matthew 13:41-43)
Jesus' teachings were based on those of the OT, where
we find that God had often blessed His servants with riches, as He had done with
Abraham and Job.
Besides, it also taught that the diligent would be
blessed by their labors while the slothful would justly suffer need:
- A slack hand causes poverty, but the hand of the diligent makes rich. He who gathers in summer is a prudent son, but he who sleeps in harvest is a son who brings shame. (Proverbs 10:4-5)
Although the Mosaic Law made provisions for the poor,
it's law would not dis-empower them by providing for the lazy. Instead, it was
acceptable that both the lazy and the diligent would reap the just fruits of
their own labors:
- The hand of the diligent will rule, while the slothful will be put to forced labor...Whoever is slothful will not roast his game, but the diligent man will get precious wealth. (Proverbs 12:24, 26)
In many ways, the OT taught that we will reap what we
sow, and this principle had been carried over into the NT (Galatians
6:9).
Were Jesus' Apostles socialists? They had been
commissioned to carry abroad Jesus' teachings. Although they often wrote about
the need to voluntarily contribute to the needs of the poor, they didn't enforce
income equality. Nor did they teach that the Church should support every needy
person among them (2 Thess. 3:10). Instead, widows were singled out for support
but only if they met certain criteria (1 Timothy 5).
Jesus too emphasized voluntary alms giving. However,
this was often to be given as a loan and not as an entitlement (Matthew
5:42).
It seemed that Jesus was in favor of the economic
status quo. No one ever accused Him of overturning the Mosaic system in favor of
income redistribution. Instead, His remedy for the human malaise was our
reconciliation to God through the Cross and not through a new economic
vision.
No comments:
Post a Comment