In his personal letters, Darwin had confessed that his
theory might simply be a fantasy. Other “believers” had confessed that the
theory of evolution is unbelievable, but so what. Dr. George Wald, Nobel Prize
winner in Biology and professor of Biology at Harvard confessed:
·
“There are only two possibilities as to how life
arose; one is spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a supernatural
creative act of God, there is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation,
that life arose from non-living matter, was scientifically disproved 120 years
ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible
conclusion—that life arose as a creative act of God. I will not accept that
philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to
believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous
generation arising to evolution.” https://ministry127.com/resources/illustration/believing-the-impossible
Dr. Harold C. Urey, Nobel Prize-holding chemist of the
University of California:
·
"All of us who study the origin of life
find that the more we look into it, the more we feel that it is too complex to
have evolved anywhere. We believe as an article of faith that life evolved from
dead matter on this planet. It is just that its complexity is so great, it is
hard for us to imagine that it did." (Urey, Harold C., quoted in Christian
Science Monitor, January 4, 1962, p. 4)
H.J. Lipson, Professor of Physics, University of Manchester,
UK:
·
"If living matter is not, then, caused by
the interplay of atoms, natural forces and radiation, how has it come into
being? I think, however, that we must go further than this and admit that the
only acceptable explanation is creation. I know that this is anathema to
physicists, as indeed it is to me, but we must not reject a theory that we do
not like if the experimental evidence supports it." (, "A physicist
looks at evolution" Physics Bulletin, 1980, vol 31, p. 138)
Doubts of other scientists:
·
"To the unprejudiced, the fossil record of
plants is in favor of special creation. Can you imagine how an orchid, a duck
weed, and a palm have come from the same ancestry, and have we any evidence for
this assumption? The evolutionist must be prepared with an answer, but I think
that most would break down before an inquisition." (E.J.H. Corner,
"Evolution" in A.M. MacLeod and L.S. Cobley, eds., Evolution in
Contemporary Botanical Thought, Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books, 1961, at 95,
97 from Bird, I, p. 234)
·
"At the present stage of geological
research, we have to admit that there is nothing in the geological records that
runs contrary to the view of conservative creationists, that God created each
species separately, presumably from the dust of the earth." (Dr. Edmund J.
Ambrose, The Nature and Origin of the Biological World, John Wiley & Sons,
1982, p. 164)
·
"I am convinced, moreover, that Darwinism,
in whatever form, is not in fact a scientific theory, but a pseudo-metaphysical
hypothesis decked out in scientific garb. In reality the theory derives its
support not from empirical data or logical deductions of a scientific kind but
from the circumstance that it happens to be the only doctrine of biological
origins that can be conceived with the constricted worldview to which a
majority of scientists no doubt subscribe." (Mathematician Wolfgang,
Smith, "The Universe is Ultimately to be Explained in Terms of a
Metacosmic Reality" in Margenau and Varghese (eds.), Cosmos, Bios, Theos,
p. 113)
·
"Life, even in bacteria, is too complex to
have occurred by chance." Molecular Biologist (Harry Rubin, "Life, Even in Bacteria, Is Too Complex
to Have Occurred by Chance" in Margenau and Varghese (eds.), Cosmos, Bios,
Theos, p. 203)
·
"Scientists have no proof that life was not
the result of an act of creation." (Jastrow, Robert, The Enchanted
Loom: Mind In the Universe, 1981, p. 19)
·
"With the benefit of hindsight, it is
amazing that paleontologists could have accepted gradual evolution as a
universal pattern on the basis of a handful of supposedly well-documented
lineages (e.g. Gryphaea, Micraster, Zaphrentis) none of which actually
withstands close scrutiny." (Paul, C. R. C., 1989, "Patterns of
Evolution and Extinction in Invertebrates", Allen, K. C. and Briggs, D. E.
G. (editors), Evolution and the Fossil Record, Smithsonian Institution
Press, Washington, D. C., 1989, p. 105)
·
"The number of intermediate varieties,
which have formerly existed must be truly enormous. Why then is not every
geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology
assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this,
perhaps is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against
the theory." (Darwin, Charles, Origin of Species, 6th edition, 1902
p. 341-342)
·
"Often a cold shudder has run through me,
and I have asked myself whether I may have not devoted myself to a fantasy."
(Charles Darwin, Life and Letters, 1887, Vol. 2, p. 229)
Perhaps macro-evolution is a fantasy promoted by those who
hate the Biblical God so much that they will cling to any un-supportable theory
that provides an alternative. Despite the laughable claims of the evolution
establishment that their theory is a proven fact and their repression of naysayers,
few investigators can take this theory seriously anymore. However, it still
holds sway in the halls of science and even in the universities as the only
alternative to a righteous God.
No comments:
Post a Comment