“Khizr Khan, the bereaved father of fallen soldier Capt.
Humayun Khan who attacked Donald Trump last week in a speech at the Democratic
National Convention, told CNN’s Jim Acosta Sunday morning that terror has
“nothing to do with Islam’”: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/07/31/khizr-khan-muslim-dad-tells-cnn-terror-nothing-islam/
·
What he [Donald Trump] cites in the name of
Islam, and all that — that is not Islam at all! I wish he would have, somebody
would have put something in his head that these are terrorists, these are
criminals, these folks have nothing to do with Islam.
Well, why are these terrorists all claiming to be Muslim?
Why do they cry out “Allahu Akbar” (“Allah is great”) in the midst of their
attacks? Why do they often let Muslims go free and kill the non-Muslims? Why
are they seeking a worldwide Caliphate and the imposition of Shariah Law on
all? And finally, why do polls show a high approval rating for the Islamic
terrorism among Muslims?
Well, the answer is plain once we just take a look at the
Koran. First of all, the Koran makes it plain that Muslims are forbidden to be
friends with non-Muslims, unless displays of “friendship” are used deceptively
to advance Islam:
·
Koran Surah 3:27: “Let not the believers take
the disbelievers for friends rather than believers. And whoever does this has
no connection with Allah unless it is done [deceptively] to guard yourselves
against them, guarding carefully.
·
5:54: “O ye who believe, take not the Jews and
the Christians for your friends and protectors. They are but friends and
protectors to each other.
·
60:1: “O you who believe! Take not My enemies
and your enemies (i.e. disbelievers and polytheists) as friends, showing
affection towards them, while they have disbelieved in what has come to you of
the truth”
·
60:4: “Indeed there has been an excellent
example for you in Ibraaheem (Abraham) and those with him, when they said to
their people: ‘Verily, we are free from you and whatever you worship besides
Allaah, we have rejected you, and there has started between us and you,
hostility and hatred for ever until you believe in Allaah Alone’”
How do Muslims understand these verses? One commentator
writes (www.koranqa.com; fatwa 59879):
·
“Undoubtedly the Muslim is obliged to hate the
enemies of Allaah and to disavow them, because this is the way of the
Messengers and their followers.
·
“Based on this, it is not permissible for a
Muslim to feel any love in his heart towards the enemies of Allaah who are in
fact his enemies too. Allaah says”:
·
“But if a Muslim treats them with kindness and
gentleness in the hope that they will become Muslim and will believe, there is
nothing wrong with that, because it comes under the heading of opening their
hearts to Islam. But if he despairs of them becoming Muslim, then he should
treat them accordingly.”
Therefore, when the believing Muslim displays friendship and
makes proclamations of fidelity to the USA, it most likely is deception (“Taqiyya”).
And why not! Muslims regard Allah as the great deceiver. Consequently, it is
totally acceptable for the Muslim also to deceive:
·
Koran 3:54; cf. 8:30: But they (the Jews) were deceptive, and
Allah was deceptive, for Allah is the best of deceivers!
·
Koran 7:99:
Are they then secure from Allah's deception (makra Allahi)? None deemeth
himself secure from Allah's deception (makra Allahi) save folk that perish.
Well, is Islam, at its core violent? These are just a few of
the many Koranic surah (verses) teaching jihad:
- Koran 8:37: “Make war on them until idolatry is no more and Allah’s religion (Islam) reigns supreme.”
- Koran 4:5: “When the Sacred Months are over, kill those who ascribe partners [like Jesus] to God wheresoever ye find them; seize them, encompass them, and ambush them; then if they repent and observe prayer and pay the alms, let them go their way’.”
- “…kill the disbelievers wherever we find them” (Koran 2:191) and “murder them and treat them harshly” (Koran 9:123), and “Strike off the heads of the disbelievers” (Koran 8:12, cp. 8:60)
Have these verses been superseded by more peaceful Koranic
verses? The exact opposite! When Muhammad began to preach, he preached peace. Without
an army, he had no alternative. However, once he got an army, the peaceful
verses were replaced by the violent ones.
This is the doctrine of “abrogation.” Later verses are
supposed to take the place of the earlier:
·
Koran 2.106
“If we [Allah] abrogate any verse or cause it to be forgotten, We will
replace it by a better one or one similar.” (Also 13.39)
Perhaps some who boldly declare that “Islam is a religion of
peace” are just ignorant. Khan is not.
It would be one thing for Khan to have stated, “Islam can be
used to justify many forms of violence, but this is not my interpretation of
Islam.” But he didn’t say that. Instead, Khan dogmatically claimed that, “these
[terrorists] are criminals, these folks have nothing to do with Islam.” This is
pure deception.
No comments:
Post a Comment