The Bible teaches a salvation through a faith/belief that
Christ died for our sins. Many claim that a salvation according to beliefs isn’t
just or wise? Wouldn’t it be more reasonable and just if salvation had,
instead, been based on love and good deeds?
This is the position of psychologist and professed
Christian, David Benner. He rejects the doctrines of the Gospel in favor of an
alternative spirituality:
·
Equating faith with beliefs truncates and
trivializes spirituality by reducing it to a mental process. Thoughts are,
quite simply, a poor substitute for relationship. Some Christians speak much of
a personal relationship with God but assume that this is based on holding right
beliefs. Is it any wonder that this attempt to reduce Ultimate Mystery to
theological propositions so often results in the principle personal
relationship being between a person and his or her own thoughts? Cherishing
thoughts about God replaces cherishing God; knowing about the Divine replaces
knowing the Divine. Whenever the Wholly Other is thought to be contained in
one’s beliefs and opinions, divine transcendence is seriously compromised and personal
relationship with the Spirit minimized. (Soulful
Spirituality, 6)
However, belief and opinions matter profoundly. If I believe
that my wife is having an affair with the neighbor, this will affect everything
about my relationship with her. If things are to improve, they must involve my
thinking.
At first glance, the Gospel might appear foolish and
divorced from fairness or justice. Paul admits as much (1 Cor. 1:25), but also
claims that it is the wisdom of God. How so? For one thing, if God used any
other criterion for salvation, none of us would qualify. Why? We all reject God
no matter what criterion He might use:
·
There is no one righteous, not even one; there
is no one who understands, no one who seeks God. All have turned away, they
have together become worthless; there is no one who does good, not even one. (Romans
3:10-12)
Consequently, Christ had to die for us while we were His
enemies (Romans 5:8-10). Therefore, salvation and everything else we mercifully
receive from God can only be received as a gift (Eph. 2:8-9; Rom. 3:26-28; Gal.
3:1-5; 5:2-4) – grace – which God grants by changing our heart so that we can
believe the obvious, that we are sinners who need the Savior who died for our
sins.
In light of this, it is not our thoughts alone that save us.
The Devil also has the right thoughts in this regard (James 2:19). Instead, it
is the gift of a new heart which opens our eyes to the truths/doctrines of the
Gospel and inclines us to receive them. If He does not change our heart, we
will continue to refuse to come to the Light of truth (John 6:44, 65).
Besides, if instead God were grade-on-a-curve and receive
the 50% who had received the highest grades on His love-test, we would become
proud and arrogant and look down on the bottom 50%. Also, we would develop an
entitlement mentality towards God, a You-owe-me mentality and not the
relational cement of gratefulness.
Benner’s view is also
incoherent (illogical). He argues in favor of a trust in an amorphous God.
Without doctrines (teachings), we would not know what we are to trust about Him!
We would be left wondering about how to live our lives for Him. Are we to love
our neighbor or slay him? Therefore, we wouldn’t be able to distinguish our
Savior from the god of Islam or the New Age. What would make the difference?
Doctrines! His self-disclosures! We can trust in Christ because we believe what
He tells us – that we are no longer
guilty of sin, and that we will be with Him for eternity. Without such
doctrines, trust has no foundation or substance! It is without form and cannot
be embraced. Consequently, we would simply be trusting in a vague subjective feeling!
What then should I trust about such a god? I would have to
trust in my feelings about him. However, I had been plagued by self-contempt
and therefore felt that God also
hated me. It was only the Spirit who worked through Scriptures who convinced me otherwise! He assured me that my
feelings didn’t reflect the revealed truths of God but my own messed-up past.
However, this leaves
the Christian faith vulnerable to another challenge:
·
If faith/salvation is a gift from God, and no
one can earn or deserve it, it is unfair to condemn those who haven’t received
this gift!
While we cannot earn or deserve salvation, we are
responsible to seek it. We can certainly cry out to God to forgive our sins and
to receive us. After all, we all know
that we are sinners. We experience guilt and shame, which validate this fact.
However, instead of dealing honestly with our spiritual need and failures, we
deny, rationalize, and justify our sins, as Jesus revealed:
·
This is the verdict: Light has come into the
world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil.
Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear
that his deeds will be exposed. (John 3:19-20)
Sadly, this has also been the condition of even His chosen
people, as the Prophet Jeremiah revealed:
·
“Does a maiden forget her jewelry, a bride her
wedding ornaments? Yet my people [Israel] have forgotten me, days without
number… On your clothes men find the lifeblood of the innocent poor, though you
did not catch them breaking in. Yet in spite of all this you say, 'I am
innocent; he is not angry with me.' But I will pass judgment on you because you
say, 'I have not sinned.'” (Jeremiah 2:32-35)
Israel had been consistently unfaithful to their God. When
they sinned, they wouldn’t confess but would deny. When we charge that God is
unfair, instead of honestly confessing our sins, we prove that we too are
Israel.
No comments:
Post a Comment