Just try to say that
ex-gays are a persecuted and marginalized minority, and you will receive
pushback a-plenty. This’s what happened to me. Everyone on Facebook demanded
documentation, and so I found the following:
“The Center for Reclaiming America cited the following
account of how a hate crime statute was egregiously applied to an
ex-homosexual:
·
In Madison, Wisconsin, a recovered homosexual
who had left the “gay” lifestyle to start a family got into a heated discussion
with an open homosexual about homosexuality at a gas station. The ex-“gay” man,
David Ott, was holding his child in his arms during the entire incident, and
neither man touched the other. The homosexual activist later told police he had
felt threatened by Ott, and local prosecutors charged the man with “disorderly
conduct” with a “hate crimes” enhancement.
·
The “hate crime” aspect, stemming from Ott’s
belief that homosexuality is morally wrong, raised the potential fine from
$1,000 to $10,000, and jail time went up from a possible 90 days to one year.
Fearing the possibility of substantial jail time, Ott settled, and received 50
hours of community service plus a mandatory attendance at “tolerance” sessions
conducted by lesbians at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. A ground rule
for the session was the premise that homosexual behavior is not immoral.
Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays (PFOX) has been the subject
of at least three (and likely more) instances of harassment because of their
view that a person can leave homosexuality; one instance involved court action
prohibiting PFOX's materials in the public school setting.
·
Arlington County Fair Incident - Reverend Louis
Sheldon, Chairman of the Traditional Values Coalition and author of The Agenda:
The Homosexual Plan to Change America
The Traditional Values
Coalition reported the following:
·
Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays (PFOX)
hosted a booth at the Arlington County Fair in Arlington, Virginia. PFOX has
had an exhibit at this fair for the past four years.
·
And, every year, intolerant homosexual activists
have done everything they could to disrupt PFOX’s display. This year, they
screamed obscenities, threw PFOX materials on the ground and demanded that PFOX
leave the fair. One PFOX volunteer was hit because he is an ex-homosexual.
·
Eventually, PFOX had to call in a police officer
to eject one activist who was harassing their volunteers. According to PFOX,
“This is not the first time that PFOX has had to summon the police for
protection from gay activists."[25]
The Traditional Values
Coalition also reported the following Virginia School Counselors Incident:
·
Parents and Friends of Ex-gays and Gays (PFOX)
was booted from a Virginia School Counselors Association annual convention last
weekend. PFOX had been officially registered at the convention and had set up a
booth to distribute materials showing that homosexuals can change. The head of
the counselor’s group asked to meet with PFOX leader Regina Griggs and told her
that several of the items in the booth were offensive to school counselors.
Among them was NARTH President Dr. Joseph Nicolosi’s book, A Parent’s Guide To Preventing Homosexuality. After offering to
remove any offensive materials from the booth, Griggs was told that PFOX should
leave anyway because it wasn’t worth their time to only distribute two
brochures at the convention.
·
Griggs told WorldNetDaily: “Some members didn’t
want us there at all. They didn’t want an alternative opinion to the teaching
they were having that afternoon.”
Judge Prohibits Public Schools from Implementing
Anti-ex-homosexual Curriculum
PFOX reported the following:
·
Montgomery County, Maryland – A United States
District Court has granted the request of Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays &
Gays (PFOX.org) for a temporary injunction prohibiting the Montgomery County,
Maryland public schools from implementing an anti-ex-gay sex ed curriculum. U.S.
District Court Judge Alexander Williams, Jr. ruled that the curriculum
threatened PFOX's constitutional rights, including the First Amendment freedom
of speech. In his opinion, Judge Williams noted some of the curriculum's biased
statements against ex-gays, including statements claiming that `[t]rying to
change one's sexual response to straight or gay is usually unsuccessful,' and
that `[i]n fact, it is often societal homophobia that forces people to attempt
to change.'” https://www.conservapedia.com/Ex-homosexuals#Religious_Liberty_Versus_Exgayphobia
What was the response
of my antagonists? Up to this point, they had dismissed all of the evidences I
had presented as “biased.”
No comments:
Post a Comment