·
ISAAC NEWTON: He wrote, “The most beautiful
system of the sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the counsel and
dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being.”
Newton believed that the evidence of design was so
extensive, only the Designer could possibly account for it.
·
ROBERT BOYLE (Died 1691): He discovered the gas
law (PV = nRT) and wrote, “Some Motives & Incentives to the Love of God”
and “The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of Creation.”
Boyle made it clear, as did also the vast majority of the early
Western scientists, that the universe pointed unfailingly to its Creator, and
this fact motivated them to further explore God through His workmanship.
·
MICHAEL FARADAY (Died 1867): “He discovered
benzene and electromagnetic radiation, invented the generator and was the main architect
of the classical field theory.” He wrote, “The book of nature which we have to
read is written by the finger of God.” (Thomas Buchanan, “The Soul of Science, Salvo Magazine, Fall 2019, 26-27)
They believed that what they were investigating could only
be explained by God rather than a blind purposeless naturalistic process. This
understanding had given them an extra dimension to their exploration of the
creation.
·
WILLIAM LORD KELVIN: He wrote, “As the depth of
our insight into the wonderful works of God increases, the stronger are out
feelings of awe and veneration in contemplating them and in endeavoring to
approach their author,” “Do not be afraid to be free thinkers. If you think
strongly enough, you will be forced by science to believe in God.”
It was this sense of “awe and veneration” that had brought
about the rebirth of science, rather than an atheistic “enlightenment.”
·
MAX PLANCK (an originator of quantum theory): He
stated, “Religion and science demand for their foundation faith in God…For
believers, God is in the beginning, and for physicists He is at the end of all
considerations…To the former He is the foundation, to the latter, the crown of
the edifice of every generalized world view.”
Consequently, they understood that the investigations into
the creation were a holy, God-honoring task, pursued to discover the Mind of
God. But why would “science demand for their foundation faith in God?”
Especially now, it seems that many scientists who reject the existence of God
are able to do science. However, the pursuit of scientific knowledge requires
basic underlying Christian presuppositions like:
·
The material world exists,
·
Its immutable laws are elegant and knowable,
·
The conclusions of science will still pertain
tomorrow even though we live in a world of molecules-in-motion,
·
We can discover truth through the labor of our
minds,
·
It is a legitimate blessing to know these truths.
While these presuppositions might appear to be
self-evidence, they aren’t. Many cultures have doubted the existence of a
knowable physical world, believing instead that it is illusory. Others had
believed that science represented an illegitimate penetration into forbidden
knowledge. Others have placed politics over free thought and the pursuit of
truth. Today, it seems that the scientific community has a growing predilection
for the latter.
No comments:
Post a Comment