I think we tend to minimize or overlook God’s mercy. Peter
didn’t, but he did not mince words as he preached to the crowd about their sin
of killing the “Righteous One.” However, then he said something that really
surprised me. Peter softened the blow by claiming that they had acted in
ignorance:
• “And now, brothers, I know that you acted in ignorance, as
did also your rulers.” (Acts 3:17)
Hadn’t their rulers acted in full awareness of the miracles
Jesus had performed? Even after the rulers had seen Jesus raised Lazarus from
the dead, they had plotted to kill both Jesus and Lazarus (John 11). How could
they have been ignorant?
Even during Peters first sermon, he reminded the crowd that
they had been made aware of Jesus through the signs and wonders He had been
performing (Acts 2:22). How the could they have been ignorant?
It also seems that Paul too had hardened his heart against
the evidences of Jesus’ Personhood. Yet he too had claimed that he had been
forgiven because he had acted “ignorantly in unbelief” (1 Timothy 1:13).
Do these examples represent a contradiction? Before we try
to reconcile these verses, I’d like to add fuel to the controversy with some
related examples. Jesus had warned that if anyone denied Him, He would deny
this person before the Father (Luke 9:26). However, Peter had denied Christ
three times, and yet, after His resurrection, He appointed Peter to oversee the
welfare of His flock (John 21:15-17)
This very same paradox is found throughout the Scriptures,
indicating that it is intentional. Lot had lived a very compromised life in
Sodom. Even after witnessing the horror of its destruction, he had even allowed
his daughters to get him drunk so that they could be impregnated by their
father. Yet, three times he is referred to as a righteous man:
• “and if he rescued righteous Lot, greatly distressed by
the sensual conduct of the wicked (for as that righteous man lived among them
day after day, he was tormenting his righteous soul over their lawless deeds
that he saw and heard). (2 Peter 2:7-8)
Could this represent a contradiction or an oversight? It
cannot. Instead, we encounter this same “contradiction” throughout. Let’s look
at three examples of exemplary faith, where we do not find faith when we
examine the original accounts in Genesis and Exodus:
• By faith Isaac invoked future blessings on Jacob and Esau.
(Hebrews 11:20)
However, the Genesis account indicates that Isaac had been
deceived and blessed Jacob rather than his favorite son Esau.
• By faith he [Moses] left Egypt, not being afraid of the
anger of the king, for he endured as seeing him who is invisible. (Hebrews
11:27)
However, the Exodus account indicates that Moses had
fearfully fled Egypt. In the next account, in God’s eyes, Israel crossed the
divided sea by faith:
• By faith the people crossed the Red Sea as on dry land,
but the Egyptians, when they attempted to do the same, were drowned. (Hebrews
11:29)
However, the original account indicates that they were in
rebellion against both Moses and God.
These accounts and many others can be easily harmonized once
we realize that our Savior is incredibly gracious. He sees faith and
righteousness where we fail to see it.
I derive two lessons from this. God is more gracious with me
than I can imagine. While I might see myself as a spiritual failure, my Savior
sees me as a spiritual giant.
The second lesson is as the first. I must also regard God’s
children as righteous men and women of valor, even if I don’t see them in this
light.
However, after Peter extended to his audience God’s gracious
judgment that they had killed Jesus in “ignorance,” he then delivered the
needful warning to repent:
• “‘And it shall be that every soul who does not listen to
that prophet [Jesus] shall be destroyed from the people.'” (Acts 3:23)
Peter demonstrated the principle that it is the graciousness
of God that is supposed to lead us to repentance, without which we face
destruction.
No comments:
Post a Comment