Some destructive heresies look incredibly benign, even
pious! Paul identified two as doctrines “taught by demons,” causing some to
“abandon the faith”:
·
The Spirit clearly says that in later times some
will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by
demons. Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have
been seared as with a hot iron. They forbid people to marry and order them to
abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving
by those who believe and who know the truth. (1 Timothy 4:1-3)
These teachings merely “forbid people to marry” and “to
abstain from certain foods.” What can be so wrong with them? Isn’t self-denial
a godly thing? Paul even advised
against marriage:
·
Now for the matters you wrote about: It is good
for a man not to marry. (1 Corinthians 7:1)
Is this a contradiction? On the one hand, Paul says it’s
good to not marry, but then he identifies this same teaching as a doctrine “taught
by demons!”
However, this paradox can be resolved. While Paul taught
that it is prudent to not marry in favor of devotion to the Lord, it is evident
that abstaining from marriage was to serve as a means of self-righteousness,
not God-righteousness.
A similar paradox will help to clear this up. Paul forbade
circumcision:
·
If you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ
will be of no value to you at all. Again I declare to every man who lets
himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole law. You who are
trying to be justified by law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen
away from grace. (Galatians 5:2-4)
However, Paul had Timothy circumcised (Acts 16:3). Wouldn’t
this have caused Timothy to “fall away from grace?” No! The physical act of
circumcision wasn’t the problem, but instead, the hope of “trying to be
justified by law” by first getting circumcised to become a Jew and a
law-keeper, thereby rejecting the sufficiency of the Cross.
Likewise, marriage or abstention-from-marriage is not the
problem but the abstention-from-marriage in hope
of earning righteousness. In both cases, the physical act was not the problem
but the belief/faith that this act
would make us righteous and deserving of God’s approval.
This is why the doctrines of demons are so destructive.
These offer an alternative to Christ,
an alternate route to salvation. Instead, our Savior wants us to understand
that His gift of salvation is entirely free. It is a gift He has given us in love by the great price of His suffering. This
gift must not be compromised by any
notion that we have earned or sacrificed for it.
If we are given a great work of art and then boast that we
had painted it, we wrongly take credit. If we boast that we are righteous
because we have abstained from certain foods and from marriage, we have become self-righteous and wrongly take credit
for the gift that can only come from
our Lord.
In both cases, we know better! We know that we didn’t design
the artwork, and we know that we lack righteousness. If we merely cease to
suppress our conscience, we will hear it say, “You are a sinner who needs a
Savior. Your efforts to earn your own righteousness are like covering a corpse
with doilies.”
No comments:
Post a Comment