My Response to Someone in Favor of Banning this Therapy:
If I believed as you do that that gay-lifestyle-change therapy (GLCT) was so destructive, forbidding it might make far more sense to me, or at least publishing something about the dangers or possible guidelines.
If I believed as you do that that gay-lifestyle-change therapy (GLCT) was so destructive, forbidding it might make far more sense to me, or at least publishing something about the dangers or possible guidelines.
However, much of this kind of therapy is merely supportive of
gays trying to leave a lifestyle that is highly self-destructive, according to all
of the stats. (Perhaps the reported negative consequences gays have experienced
in GLCT were not due to GLCT, but to the dangers inherent in this lifestyle.)
I certainly agree with you that some of our deepest
inclinations are difficult or even impossible to change. Some require a
miracle. Consequently, maturity is often a matter of learning how to live with
our self-destructive impulses – and I certainly have my share – rather than eradicating
them. If some therapists have subjected their clients to extreme measures, like
shock therapy, to eradicate these impulses, I would certainly join you in
questioning their usefulness.
However, I would remind you that extreme measures have been
used – and they are still used – in treating depression. However, would you ban
ALL therapies for depression because of these aberrations? Certainly not, and
no one else suggests this extreme course of action. Why then do we find this
extreme reaction in regards to GLCT?
I think that the answer is one of politics, pressure groups,
peer-intimidation and political correctness. In this regards, please see: http://mannsword.blogspot.com/2011/03/politically-correct-american.html
Nevertheless, I have met many ex-gays who have been helped
with their same-sex attraction (SSA) through counseling. Some even have
subsequently married. Some admit that they still struggle with SSA, while
others claim that they are no longer troubled by SSA. Should we believe their
testimonies? Why not! All of the studies gauging therapeutic success rely upon
self-reporting. Why then just call self-reporting about SSA into question? I
think that this reflects the bias of those who oppose this form of therapy.
No comments:
Post a Comment