Sometimes, less is best. This is a brief proof, among many, for the existence of God. It is sometimes called the Cosmological Argument:
1. All things that have come into existence are caused to exist by other things.
2. If there is no eternal uncaused Causer, then nothing can exist.
3. Therefore, there must be an eternal uncaused Causer - God.
PREMISE #1: To deny this is absurd. To illustrate, if I tell you that my cup of coffee just appeared without any cause, you would think me crazy. This is because we never see uncaused things materialize out of nothing.
We reasonably assume that there are causes for any phenomena. That’s why we do science – to discover the causal relationships. Therefore, to deny that phenomena require causes is to reject science.
PREMISE #2: It follows that something or Someone must be uncaused and therefore eternal to explain the existence of everything else.
However, eternal can’t be a something – the universe or some part of it. Matter and space cannot exist apart from time, but time could not have been eternal. This would have required that an infinite number of years to have already passed for us to be here in the present – a logical impossibility. Big Bang cosmology also rules this out.
Besides, the law of entropy argues against an eternal universe, since by now, everything would have dissipated.
CONCLUSION: This leaves us face-to-face with a Being who transcends time, space, and materiality.