There is a lot in the Bible that can be confusing.
Consequently, one young man asked me about the confusion that he was
experiencing. On the one hand, the Bible requires us to be obedient. However, he
feared becoming legalistic - trusting in obedience to make himself acceptable
before God.
I explained that in order to resolve this problem, we have
to distinguish between performing works of obedience – something required (John
14:21-24) – and trusting in them to merit or earn salvation. To illustrate this
crucial distinction, Paul forbade circumcision:
·
If you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ
will be of no value to you at all. Again I declare to every man who lets
himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole law. You who are
trying to be justified by law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen
away from grace. (Galatians 5:2-4)
However, Paul had Timothy circumcised (Acts 16:3). Wouldn’t
this have caused Timothy to “fall away from grace?” No! The physical act of
circumcision wasn’t the problem, but instead, trusting in the act “to be
justified by law.” The Circumcision Party had been insisting that in addition to trusting in the Gospel for
salvation, the believer had to be circumcised to become a Jew and a law-keeper.
This belief rejects the sufficiency of the Cross and the teaching that salvation
is a free gift.
Paul had Timothy circumcised, not to save him, but to
enable him to minister among the Jews - a matter of a physical act, which did
not detract from Timothy’s faith in Christ.
Many other apparent contradictions can be resolved by making
this same distinction better the physical act and what we believe
about this act. For example, Paul had taught that remaining single for
the sake of devoting oneself to the Lord was commendable, but he also had
warned against those who were forbidding marriage:
·
The Spirit clearly says that in later times some
will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by
demons. Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have
been seared as with a hot iron. They forbid people to marry and order them to
abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving
by those who believe and who know the truth. (1 Timothy 4:1-3)
These teachings merely “forbid people to marry” and “to
abstain from certain foods.” What can be so wrong with them? Isn’t self-denial
a godly thing? Paul even advised against marriage:
·
Now for the matters you wrote about: It is good
for a man not to marry. (1 Corinthians 7:1)
Is this a contradiction? On the one hand, Paul says it’s
good to not marry, but he also identifies this same teaching as a doctrine
“taught by demons!”
However, this paradox can be easily resolved. While Paul
taught that it is prudent to not marry in favor of devotion to the Lord, it is
evident that abstaining from marriage served as a means of self-righteousness
for some. Instead of trusting in the Good News of salvation, they were trusting
in their own sacrifice to make themselves righteous in God’s eyes.
We are called to Biblical obedience but not to an unbiblical
trust in our obedience. However, obedience to the Word is a sign that we truly
believe. If we trust in Christ, we will do as He instructs. If we do not trust
in Him, we will not. Therefore, many verses instruct us that where there is no
obedience, there is also no faith. A good tree will bear good fruit, even if
that only means humbly confessing our sins.
No comments:
Post a Comment