Jesus had taught: “You are of more value than many sparrows.”
(Matthew 10:31). Up to two hundred years ago, such a statement would not have
raised an eyebrow. However, today it has become quite controversial within
certain circles, where it is claimed that all life is of equal value.”
However, most still believe that we are more valuable than
sparrows, mosquitoes, and even cows. How do they justify this claim in our
post-Christian society? They offer various possibilities, like, “Humanity is more
valuable than animals because…
·
We are sentient being, or
·
We feel and love more deeply, or
·
We are intelligent and creative, or…”
However, these sources of value, by themselves, are totally
inadequate in justifying our greater value. They just shift the question of
value to other unjustified criteria – intelligence, feelings, and creativity.
What is able to impart value to these criteria, especially in view of a
God-less world that lacks any inherent meaning?
The atheistic philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche, was able to perceive
this problem in the late 19th century. In The Gay Science (Section 125, The
Madman), he wrote:
·
“God is dead. God remains dead. And we have
killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers?
What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to
death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there
for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall
we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we
ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?”
Nietzsche realized that without God, we would now have to “become
gods” to arbitrarily and subjectively create our own values. There is no other
alternative. However, we encounter another problem when we try to create value
in a valueless, meaningless universe.
Besides, our creations of value cannot match God’s. For
example, if our value depends on our higher degree of intelligence or
sentience, then we have to sacrifice other values, like human equality, in the
process.
Why? Well, some of us are more intelligent and educated than
others. Adults are more intelligent than babies and the elderly. They are also
more successful and contribute more to society. Do we want a world where our
relative value is socially determined? Of course not! However, when we reject God,
we also reject any coherent system of laws and values. Atheist Arthur Leff of
the Duke School of Law had written:
·
“The so-called death of God wasn’t just His
funeral, but was the elimination of any coherent ethical or legal system…As it
stands now, everything is up for grabs…Napalming babies is bad, starving the
poor wicked, buying and selling people is depraved—but, ‘Sez who?’ God help
us.”
Neff understood that without God there exists no basis for
any meaningful system of values or laws. Instead, we have banished ourselves into
a meaningless, valueless, and lifeless desert, self-condemned to obsessively and
hopelessly prove that we do have value.
This is a world where we are forced to play make-believe to fill in the emptiness left by the death-of-God. It is like sitting in a corner making believe you have a family, when you really don’t. Ordinarily, we would regard such a fantasy world as sick, a retreat into a schizoid existence. However, we frogs in a pot of water, momentarily enjoying the warmth until we are finally cooked.
This is a world where we are forced to play make-believe to fill in the emptiness left by the death-of-God. It is like sitting in a corner making believe you have a family, when you really don’t. Ordinarily, we would regard such a fantasy world as sick, a retreat into a schizoid existence. However, we frogs in a pot of water, momentarily enjoying the warmth until we are finally cooked.
No comments:
Post a Comment